PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDDD vs. CWII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDDD vs. CWII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDDD

1D
0.79%
1M
2.76%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CWII

1D
-1.60%
1M
-10.42%
YTD
35.03%
6M
9.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDDD vs. CWII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDDD and CWII is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDDD vs. CWII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDDD vs. CWII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDDDCWIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.94

-0.40

+3.34

Drawdowns

DDDD vs. CWII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDDD drawdown since its inception was -1.88%, smaller than the maximum CWII drawdown of -48.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDDD and CWII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDDDCWIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-48.46%

+46.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-21.90%

+21.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-30.49%

+29.90%

Volatility

DDDD vs. CWII - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDDDCWIIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.71%

88.33%

-78.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.71%

88.33%

-78.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.71%

88.33%

-78.62%

DDDD vs. CWII - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDDD has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than CWII's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDDD vs. CWII - Dividend Comparison

DDDD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CWII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.06%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DDDD and CWII have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DDDD is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDDD is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 21.06%, compared with 0.00% for DDDD.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DDDD and 1.03% for CWII.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDDD and CWII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer