DDDD vs. ARMW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DDDD (YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

DDDD vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DDDD

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 2.56%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMW

• 1D: 3.44%
• 1M: 128.75%
• YTD: 363.23%
• 6M: 245.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDDD vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DDDD YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF	5.08%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	342.64%

Correlation

The correlation between DDDD and ARMW is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026	0.20

Return for Risk

DDDD vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DDDD	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.55	4.96	-2.41

Drawdowns

DDDD vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDDD drawdown since its inception was -1.88%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDDD and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDDD	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.88%	-48.47%	+46.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.22%	0.00%	-1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.60%	-26.55%	+25.95%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDDD	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.69%	88.46%	-78.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.69%	88.46%	-78.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.69%	88.46%	-78.77%

DDDD vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDDD and ARMW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

DDDD vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

DDDD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.20%.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	15.20%	16.38%
DDDD YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDDD and ARMW in my portfolio?

DDDD and ARMW have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DDDD or ARMW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDDD or ARMW?

DDDD and ARMW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDDD or ARMW?

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 0.00% for DDDD.

What is the main difference between DDDD and ARMW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill Investments.