DDD vs. QQQI
DDD (3D Systems Corporation) is a stock, while QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, DDD returned 75.44% vs 22.03% for QQQI. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DDD vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDD achieves a 69.49% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 10.40% return.
DDD
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 21.46%
- YTD
- 69.49%
- 1Y
- 75.44%
- 3Y*
- -33.21%
- 5Y*
- -36.32%
- 10Y*
- -14.70%
QQQI
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 1Y
- 22.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDD vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DDD 3D Systems Corporation | 69.49% | -46.04% | -36.56% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 10.40% | 18.62% | 19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDD and QQQI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDD vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
DDD
QQQI
DDD vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3D Systems Corporation (DDD) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDD | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 2.30 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.31 | 9.51 | -7.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDD vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDD drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDD and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDD | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.58% | -20.00% | -78.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.17% | -9.61% | -43.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.89% | -2.84% | -94.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.56% | -2.21% | -56.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.80% | 2.32% | +30.48% |
Volatility
DDD vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
3D Systems Corporation (DDD) has a higher volatility of 20.35% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 7.43%. This indicates that DDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDD | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.35% | 7.43% | +12.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.12% | 12.76% | +49.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.50% | 15.44% | +79.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.49% | 17.60% | +61.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.07% | 17.60% | +65.47% |
Dividends
DDD vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
DDD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DDD 3D Systems Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.76% | 13.82% | 12.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDD and QQQI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DDD has higher volatility (20.35%) compared to QQQI (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDD dropped -98.58% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDD and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer