DDD vs. MSFT
DDD (3D Systems Corporation) and MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — DDD in Computer Hardware, MSFT in Software - Infrastructure. Over the past 10 years, DDD returned -13.26%/yr vs 25.40%/yr for MSFT. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
DDD vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDD achieves a 101.13% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's 2.35% return. Over the past 10 years, DDD has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of -13.26%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.40% annualized return.
DDD
- 1D
- 25.80%
- 1M
- 27.14%
- 6M
- 58.93%
- YTD
- 101.13%
- 1Y
- 115.76%
- 3Y*
- -23.78%
- 5Y*
- -33.83%
- 10Y*
- -13.26%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.24%
MSFT
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 26.20%
- 6M
- 20.38%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- -7.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 25.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 25.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.70M | $9.02M | $14.86M | |
| $21.01B | $15.96B | $16.86B |
DDD vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDD 3D Systems Corporation | 101.13% | -46.04% | -48.35% | -14.19% | -65.65% | 105.53% | 19.77% | -13.96% | 17.71% | -34.99% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 2.35% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDD and MSFT is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1990 | 0.22 |
The correlation between DDD and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DDD:
$581.49M
MSFT:
$3.66T
DDD:
-$0.40
MSFT:
$17.94
DDD:
1.25
MSFT:
11.07
DDD:
1.94
MSFT:
8.30
DDD:
$387.64M
MSFT:
$331.84B
DDD:
$129.92M
MSFT:
$225.47B
DDD:
-$25.02M
MSFT:
$207.52B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDD vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
DDD
MSFT
DDD vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3D Systems Corporation (DDD) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDD | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.98 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | -0.21 | +2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.46 | -0.38 | +3.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDD vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDD drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDD and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDD | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.58% | -69.38% | -29.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.17% | -34.50% | -18.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.04% | -34.50% | -48.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.02% | -37.15% | -58.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.52% | -37.15% | -60.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.31% | -8.51% | -87.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -21.80% | -36.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.56% | 19.37% | +14.19% |
Volatility
DDD vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
3D Systems Corporation (DDD) has a higher volatility of 29.08% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 16.29%. This indicates that DDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDD | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.08% | 16.29% | +12.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.36% | 26.79% | +37.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.26% | 32.03% | +66.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.37% | 28.10% | +52.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.36% | 27.67% | +55.69% |
Dividends
DDD vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
DDD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDD 3D Systems Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.72% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Financials
DDD vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3D Systems Corporation and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DDD vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison
DDD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, 3D Systems Corporation reported a gross profit of 34.46M and revenue of 94.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.4%.
MSFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 60.48B and revenue of 90.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.
DDD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, 3D Systems Corporation reported an operating income of -10.65M and revenue of 94.58M, resulting in an operating margin of -11.3%.
MSFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 40.60B and revenue of 90.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.1%.
DDD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, 3D Systems Corporation reported a net income of -12.86M and revenue of 94.58M, resulting in a net margin of -13.6%.
MSFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 35.77B and revenue of 90.01B, resulting in a net margin of 39.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDD and MSFT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DDD has higher volatility (29.08%) compared to MSFT (16.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDD dropped -98.58% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
DDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDD and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer