DD vs. FNDF
DD (DuPont de Nemours, Inc.) is a stock, while FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Over the past 5 years, DD returned 8.25%/yr vs 13.35%/yr for FNDF. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
DD vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DD having a 21.17% return and FNDF slightly higher at 21.21%.
DD
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 6.84%
- YTD
- 21.17%
- 6M
- 22.82%
- 1Y
- 74.50%
- 3Y*
- 19.17%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- —
FNDF
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 6.97%
- YTD
- 21.21%
- 6M
- 24.72%
- 1Y
- 44.71%
- 3Y*
- 24.10%
- 5Y*
- 13.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
DD vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DD DuPont de Nemours, Inc. | 21.17% | 28.77% | 1.04% | 14.36% | -13.36% | 15.41% | 13.28% | -14.90% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 21.21% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | -7.78% | 14.97% | 3.61% | 12.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between DD and FNDF is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019 | 0.63 |
The correlation between DD and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DD vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank
DD
FNDF
DD vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (DD) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DD | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.53 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | 4.24 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.67 | 16.19 | -2.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DD | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 2.99 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.83 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.54 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
DD vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DD drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DD and FNDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DD | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.03% | -40.14% | -21.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.31% | -10.60% | -6.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.84% | -13.89% | -23.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.22% | -25.56% | -14.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.47% | -0.67% | -4.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.59% | -7.64% | -6.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.47% | 2.77% | +2.70% |
Volatility
DD vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (DD) has a higher volatility of 12.89% compared to Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) at 5.26%. This indicates that DD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DD | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.89% | 5.26% | +7.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.82% | 12.53% | +10.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.62% | 15.06% | +15.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.94% | 16.18% | +13.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.79% | 17.67% | +16.12% |
Dividends
DD vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
DD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.86%, more than FNDF's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DD DuPont de Nemours, Inc. | 101.86% | 121.72% | 1.99% | 1.87% | 1.92% | 1.49% | 1.69% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 2.84% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DD and FNDF have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DD has higher volatility (12.89%) compared to FNDF (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DD dropped -62.03% vs FNDF's -40.14%.
FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DD and FNDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer