DCPE vs. ABEQ
DCPE (DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF) and ABEQ (Absolute Select Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DCPE is passively managed, while ABEQ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DCPE returned 12.19%/yr vs 11.57%/yr for ABEQ. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DCPE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ABEQ.
Performance
DCPE vs. ABEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCPE achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly lower than ABEQ's 3.44% return.
DCPE
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- -1.70%
- 6M
- -1.38%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABEQ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 8.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- —
DCPE vs. ABEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCPE DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF | -1.70% | 9.10% | 14.40% | 27.65% | -15.28% |
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF | 3.44% | 15.32% | 12.68% | 4.63% | -6.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between DCPE and ABEQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022 | 0.70 |
The correlation between DCPE and ABEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DCPE vs. ABEQ — Risk / Return Rank
DCPE
ABEQ
DCPE vs. ABEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF (DCPE) and Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DCPE | ABEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 1.00 | -0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.52 | 1.46 | -0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.18 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 1.13 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.24 | 2.78 | -1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DCPE | ABEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 1.00 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.56 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
DCPE vs. ABEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCPE drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, smaller than the maximum ABEQ drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCPE and ABEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCPE | ABEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.07% | -27.82% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -7.89% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.32% | -7.95% | -6.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -7.43% | +2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -4.07% | -0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 3.20% | -0.55% |
Volatility
DCPE vs. ABEQ - Volatility Comparison
DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF (DCPE) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) at 1.98%. This indicates that DCPE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DCPE | ABEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 1.98% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 6.69% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.89% | 8.91% | +1.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 10.81% | +6.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 13.84% | +3.09% |
DCPE vs. ABEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DCPE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ABEQ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DCPE vs. ABEQ - Dividend Comparison
DCPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than ABEQ's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF | 1.21% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 2.60% | 1.20% | 0.60% | 0.60% |
DCPE DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF | 1.41% | 1.39% | 1.23% | 1.01% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DCPE and ABEQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DCPE has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to ABEQ (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCPE dropped -22.07% vs ABEQ's -27.82%.
On 3-year performance, DCPE leads with 12.19% vs 11.57% for ABEQ. On fees, DCPE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ABEQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DCPE has performed better with a 12.19% return vs 11.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DCPE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ABEQ.
DCPE has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 1.21% for ABEQ.
They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and Absolute Investment Advisers LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DCPE and 0.85% for ABEQ.
ABEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DCPE and ABEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer