DCPE vs. DBND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DCPE (DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF) and DBND (DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DCPE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Index, while DBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DCPE returned 12.19%/yr vs 4.50%/yr for DBND. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DCPE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DBND.

Performance

DCPE vs. DBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF (DCPE) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCPE achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly lower than DBND's -0.21% return.

DCPE

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: -1.70%
• 6M: -1.38%
• 1Y: 3.29%
• 3Y*: 12.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBND

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: -0.21%
• 6M: -0.07%
• 1Y: 4.85%
• 3Y*: 4.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCPE vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DCPE DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF	-1.70%	9.10%	14.40%	27.65%	-15.55%
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	-0.21%	7.41%	3.06%	6.33%	-5.93%

Correlation

The correlation between DCPE and DBND is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022	0.25

The correlation between DCPE and DBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DCPE vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCPE

DCPE Risk / Return Rank: 14
DCPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
DCPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
DCPE Omega Ratio Rank: 13
DCPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
DCPE Martin Ratio Rank: 15

DBND

DBND Risk / Return Rank: 39
DBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
DBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
DBND Omega Ratio Rank: 41
DBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
DBND Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCPE vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF (DCPE) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DCPE	DBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	1.48	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.52	2.23	-1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.27	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	1.72	-1.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.24	5.10	-3.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DCPE vs. DBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCPE Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the DBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCPE and DBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DCPE	DBND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30	1.48	-1.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.48	-0.06

Drawdowns

DCPE vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCPE drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, which is greater than DBND's maximum drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCPE and DBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	DCPE	DBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.07%	-9.39%	-12.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.68%	-2.83%	-6.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.32%	-6.25%	-8.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.83%	-1.80%	-3.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-2.27%	-2.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	0.95%	+1.70%

Volatility

DCPE vs. DBND - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF (DCPE) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) at 1.07%. This indicates that DCPE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DCPE	DBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.63%	1.07%	+1.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.04%	2.33%	+5.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.89%	3.30%	+7.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.93%	5.09%	+11.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.93%	5.09%	+11.84%

DCPE vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCPE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DCPE vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison

DCPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than DBND's 4.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	4.79%	4.78%	5.19%	4.39%	2.74%
DCPE DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF	1.41%	1.39%	1.23%	1.01%	0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DCPE and DBND in my portfolio?

DCPE and DBND have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DCPE or DBND?

DCPE has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to DBND (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCPE dropped -22.07% vs DBND's -9.39%.

Which ETF is better, DCPE or DBND?

On 3-year performance, DCPE leads with 12.19% vs 4.50% for DBND. On fees, DBND is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DCPE or DBND?

Over the 3-year period, DCPE has performed better with a 12.19% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DCPE or DBND?

DBND is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DCPE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DCPE or DBND?

DBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 1.41% for DCPE.

What is the main difference between DCPE and DBND?

DCPE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. DCPE tracks Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Index, while DBND tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DCPE and 0.50% for DBND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.