DBXD.DE vs. XB4A.DE
DBXD.DE (Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C) and XB4A.DE (Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds from Xtrackers - DBXD.DE tracks the DAX® while XB4A.DE tracks the ATX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBXD.DE returned 9.02%/yr vs 14.71%/yr for XB4A.DE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBXD.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XB4A.DE.
Performance
DBXD.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBXD.DE achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than XB4A.DE's 24.81% return. Over the past 10 years, DBXD.DE has underperformed XB4A.DE with an annualized return of 9.02%, while XB4A.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.71% annualized return.
DBXD.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- 6M
- -1.52%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 3.46%
- 3Y*
- 15.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
XB4A.DE
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 22.10%
- YTD
- 24.81%
- 1Y
- 48.60%
- 3Y*
- 31.52%
- 5Y*
- 18.18%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
DBXD.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXD.DE Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C | 1.61% | 22.65% | 18.18% | 19.60% | -12.74% | 15.26% | 3.11% | 24.69% | -18.52% | 12.12% |
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 24.81% | 51.29% | 11.01% | 14.27% | -16.45% | 42.39% | -10.86% | 19.79% | -17.99% | 32.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBXD.DE and XB4A.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2011 | 0.70 |
The correlation between DBXD.DE and XB4A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBXD.DE vs. XB4A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBXD.DE
XB4A.DE
DBXD.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) and Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBXD.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.46 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 4.44 | -4.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.88 | 15.07 | -14.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBXD.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBXD.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.83%, roughly equal to the maximum XB4A.DE drawdown of -53.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXD.DE and XB4A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBXD.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.83% | -53.54% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -10.88% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.92% | -16.26% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.70% | -32.50% | +5.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.83% | -53.54% | +14.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -1.85% | -1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.28% | -9.88% | -1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 3.22% | +0.72% |
Volatility
DBXD.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) is 4.64%, while Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that DBXD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XB4A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBXD.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 5.22% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.60% | 14.88% | -1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.28% | 17.61% | -1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 19.15% | -1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 20.15% | -2.05% |
DBXD.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBXD.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XB4A.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DBXD.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBXD.DE nor XB4A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBXD.DE and XB4A.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBXD.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBXD.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XB4A.DE.
DBXD.DE tracks DAX®, while XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DBXD.DE and 0.25% for XB4A.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBXD.DE and XB4A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer