DBX9.DE vs. XCS6.DE
DBX9.DE (Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C) and XCS6.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C) are both China Equities funds from Xtrackers - DBX9.DE tracks the FTSE China 50 while XCS6.DE tracks the MSCI China. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBX9.DE returned 4.72%/yr vs 3.98%/yr for XCS6.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBX9.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for XCS6.DE.
Performance
DBX9.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX9.DE achieves a 15.56% return, which is significantly higher than XCS6.DE's -13.28% return. Over the past 10 years, DBX9.DE has outperformed XCS6.DE with an annualized return of 4.72%, while XCS6.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 3.98% annualized return.
DBX9.DE
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 6M
- 17.29%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 0.61%
- 10Y*
- 4.72%
XCS6.DE
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- -6.56%
- YTD
- -13.28%
- 6M
- -12.83%
- 1Y
- -4.84%
- 3Y*
- 5.73%
- 5Y*
- -6.36%
- 10Y*
- 3.98%
DBX9.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 15.56% | 10.03% | 37.71% | -16.44% | -13.64% | -14.99% | -0.86% | 18.35% | -9.23% | 18.88% |
XCS6.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C | -13.28% | 16.41% | 27.02% | -15.14% | -15.45% | -17.26% | 15.12% | 26.93% | -16.16% | 35.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX9.DE and XCS6.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2011 | 0.93 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DBX9.DE and XCS6.DE has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.93, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX9.DE vs. XCS6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX9.DE
XCS6.DE
DBX9.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBX9.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.97 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.97 | -0.23 | +6.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.49 | -0.52 | +16.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBX9.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX9.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.51%, which is greater than XCS6.DE's maximum drawdown of -56.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX9.DE and XCS6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX9.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.51% | -56.31% | -10.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.62% | -20.86% | +14.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.85% | -24.75% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.60% | -49.93% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.99% | -56.31% | +2.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.16% | -37.92% | +27.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.44% | -21.23% | -8.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 9.34% | -6.79% |
Volatility
DBX9.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) is 5.99%, while Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that DBX9.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCS6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX9.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 6.73% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.34% | 13.44% | -2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 18.71% | -2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.23% | 27.69% | -0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.52% | 25.29% | -0.77% |
DBX9.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX9.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than XCS6.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX9.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBX9.DE nor XCS6.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBX9.DE and XCS6.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBX9.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBX9.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XCS6.DE.
DBX9.DE tracks FTSE China 50, while XCS6.DE tracks MSCI China. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DBX9.DE and 0.65% for XCS6.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBX9.DE and XCS6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer