DBX9.DE vs. FLXC.DE
DBX9.DE (Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C) and FLXC.DE (Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - DBX9.DE tracks the FTSE China 50 while FLXC.DE tracks the FTSE China 30/18 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBX9.DE returned 0.17%/yr vs -3.95%/yr for FLXC.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBX9.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLXC.DE.
Performance
DBX9.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX9.DE achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly higher than FLXC.DE's -5.94% return.
DBX9.DE
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 6M
- 13.25%
- 1Y
- 32.77%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
FLXC.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -5.94%
- 6M
- -7.13%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
DBX9.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 9.85% | 10.01% | 37.68% | -16.44% | -13.62% | -14.98% | -0.87% | 13.29% |
FLXC.DE Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -5.94% | 17.34% | 27.28% | -15.77% | -15.90% | -14.60% | 16.83% | 19.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX9.DE and FLXC.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2019 | 0.91 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DBX9.DE and FLXC.DE has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX9.DE vs. FLXC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX9.DE
FLXC.DE
DBX9.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBX9.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.06 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 0.31 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | 0.64 | +3.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBX9.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 0.27 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | -0.15 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.09 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
DBX9.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX9.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.51%, which is greater than FLXC.DE's maximum drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX9.DE and FLXC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX9.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.51% | -55.61% | -10.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.20% | -15.19% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.83% | -24.70% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.59% | -49.07% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.62% | -30.89% | +16.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.50% | -27.95% | -1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.91% | 7.38% | +1.53% |
Volatility
DBX9.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) is 5.29%, while Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that DBX9.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX9.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 6.78% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 12.35% | -1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.35% | 17.78% | +8.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.75% | 26.71% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.42% | 26.20% | -0.78% |
DBX9.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX9.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXC.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX9.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBX9.DE nor FLXC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBX9.DE and FLXC.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DBX9.DE.
DBX9.DE tracks FTSE China 50, while FLXC.DE tracks FTSE China 30/18 Capped. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DBX9.DE and 0.19% for FLXC.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBX9.DE and FLXC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer