C024.DE vs. FLCH

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH).

C024.DE and FLCH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. C024.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A. It was launched on Mar 10, 2023. FLCH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. Both C024.DE and FLCH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

C024.DE vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

C024.DE vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist	1.62%	14.97%	22.87%	-17.78%	-16.12%	3.37%	21.54%	40.72%	-22.27%	0.86%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-4.38%	16.82%	25.79%	-13.88%	-17.96%	-14.95%	19.37%	27.13%	-15.75%	-2.39%

Different Trading Currencies

C024.DE is traded in EUR, while FLCH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLCH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C024.DE achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -4.38% return.

C024.DE

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 1.62%
• 6M: 3.76%
• 1Y: 22.70%
• 3Y*: 5.31%
• 5Y*: -0.65%
• 10Y*: 5.90%

FLCH

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: -1.50%
• YTD: -4.38%
• 6M: -12.65%
• 1Y: 1.01%
• 3Y*: 5.46%
• 5Y*: -4.55%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C024.DE vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

C024.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

C024.DE

Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist

FLCH

Franklin FTSE China ETF

Return for Risk

C024.DE vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C024.DE

C024.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
C024.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
C024.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
C024.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
C024.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
C024.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 82

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 19
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 20
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C024.DE vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	C024.DE	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	0.04	+1.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	0.22	+1.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.03	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.95	0.00	+3.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.89	0.01	+10.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

C024.DE vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C024.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C024.DE and FLCH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	C024.DE	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	0.04	+1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	-0.16	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.02	+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between C024.DE and FLCH is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

C024.DE vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

C024.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than FLCH's 2.51% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist	1.86%	1.89%	2.19%	1.98%	1.34%	1.23%	1.42%	1.88%	2.49%	0.00%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.51%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%

Drawdowns

C024.DE vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C024.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.68%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C024.DE and FLCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	C024.DE	FLCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.68%	-62.09%	+12.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.57%	-15.88%	+8.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.91%	-56.06%	+15.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.06%	-33.80%	+16.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.00%	-30.50%	+5.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	6.02%	-3.56%

Volatility

C024.DE vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) is 5.02%, while Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that C024.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	C024.DE	FLCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.02%	6.20%	-1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.08%	13.88%	-2.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.16%	23.28%	-7.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.95%	28.28%	-5.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.35%	27.26%	-2.91%