C024.DE vs. FLCH
C024.DE (Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both China Equities funds - C024.DE tracks the MSCI China A while FLCH tracks the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, C024.DE returned 2.16%/yr vs -5.71%/yr for FLCH. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. C024.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.
Performance
C024.DE vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
C024.DE is traded in EUR, while FLCH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLCH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C024.DE achieves a 18.32% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -11.15% return.
C024.DE
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 18.32%
- 6M
- 20.17%
- 1Y
- 47.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 7.87%
FLCH
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- -11.15%
- 6M
- -11.85%
- 1Y
- -2.55%
- 3Y*
- 6.66%
- 5Y*
- -5.71%
- 10Y*
- —
C024.DE vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 18.32% | 14.97% | 22.87% | -17.78% | -16.16% | 3.42% | 21.54% | 40.72% | -22.27% | 1.65% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -11.15% | 16.82% | 25.79% | -13.88% | -17.96% | -14.95% | 19.37% | 27.13% | -15.75% | -1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between C024.DE and FLCH is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.64 |
The correlation between C024.DE and FLCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C024.DE vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank
C024.DE
FLCH
C024.DE vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| C024.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 0.99 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.94 | -0.14 | +7.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.15 | -0.32 | +20.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
C024.DE vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C024.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.68%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C024.DE and FLCH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C024.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.68% | -55.61% | +5.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.78% | -18.84% | +12.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.82% | -24.49% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.34% | -48.72% | +9.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.43% | -35.81% | +32.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.32% | -25.81% | -0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 8.08% | -5.74% |
Volatility
C024.DE vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 5.12%. This indicates that C024.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C024.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 5.12% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.01% | 13.21% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.20% | 18.75% | -2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 28.33% | -5.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.04% | 27.04% | -3.00% |
C024.DE vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
C024.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
C024.DE vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
C024.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than FLCH's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 1.60% | 1.89% | 2.19% | 1.98% | 1.34% | 1.22% | 1.42% | 1.88% | 2.49% | 0.00% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 1.81% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
C024.DE and FLCH have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for C024.DE.
C024.DE tracks MSCI China A, while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for C024.DE and 0.19% for FLCH.
Find the right allocation for C024.DE and FLCH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer