AH50.DE vs. CHIN.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE) and KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE).
AH50.DE and CHIN.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AH50.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Mar 22, 2016. CHIN.DE is a passively managed fund by KraneShares that tracks the performance of the S&P China 500 Index. It was launched on Oct 16, 2023. Both AH50.DE and CHIN.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AH50.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AH50.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 2.54% | 11.41% | 26.06% | -7.45% |
CHIN.DE KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD | -1.56% | 16.60% | 23.10% | -6.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AH50.DE achieves a 2.54% return, which is significantly higher than CHIN.DE's -1.56% return.
AH50.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 2.54%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- 16.71%
- 3Y*
- 6.23%
- 5Y*
- -0.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.29%
CHIN.DE
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -4.29%
- 1Y
- 12.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AH50.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AH50.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CHIN.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AH50.DE vs. CHIN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AH50.DE
CHIN.DE
AH50.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE) and KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AH50.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 0.68 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.00 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.14 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 1.90 | +0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.97 | 4.90 | +3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AH50.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 0.68 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.53 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between AH50.DE and CHIN.DE is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AH50.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Dividend Comparison
AH50.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, while CHIN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 2.28% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.80% | 3.06% | 1.67% | 1.80% | 1.65% | 2.56% | 2.44% |
CHIN.DE KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AH50.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AH50.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.20%, which is greater than CHIN.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AH50.DE and CHIN.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AH50.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.20% | -22.95% | -22.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.24% | -10.07% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.92% | -7.05% | -7.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.92% | -8.01% | -8.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 3.42% | -0.86% |
Volatility
AH50.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE) is 4.84%, while KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that AH50.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHIN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AH50.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 5.27% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.02% | 12.50% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.03% | 18.88% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 22.59% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 22.59% | +0.21% |