PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBP vs. PLTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBP vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBP achieves a -7.35% return, which is significantly higher than PLTM's -19.61% return.


DBP

1D
-2.46%
1M
-11.00%
YTD
-7.35%
6M
-11.28%
1Y
27.61%
3Y*
29.27%
5Y*
16.74%
10Y*
10.50%

PLTM

1D
-1.49%
1M
-14.13%
YTD
-19.61%
6M
-27.97%
1Y
27.29%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBP vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DBP
Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund
-7.35%73.43%26.71%8.68%-1.51%-7.10%26.79%15.89%-5.51%
PLTM
GraniteShares Platinum Trust
-19.61%124.46%-8.91%-8.10%10.83%-10.52%10.87%20.76%-20.92%

Correlation

The correlation between DBP and PLTM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2018

0.58

The correlation between DBP and PLTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBP vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBP
DBP Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
DBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBP Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
DBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBP Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTM
PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBP vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBPPLTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.14

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

0.67

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.25

1.49

+0.76

DBP vs. PLTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBP Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the PLTM Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBP and PLTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBP vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBP drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, which is greater than PLTM's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBP and PLTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBPPLTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.89%

-42.32%

-11.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.18%

-40.62%

+10.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.18%

-40.62%

+10.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.18%

-40.62%

+10.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.18%

-40.62%

+10.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-18.66%

-6.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.30%

18.37%

-6.07%

Volatility

DBP vs. PLTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) is 8.93%, while GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) has a volatility of 11.52%. This indicates that DBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBPPLTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.93%

11.52%

-2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.96%

46.02%

-15.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.62%

51.35%

-17.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.18%

32.99%

-11.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

31.10%

-12.27%

DBP vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBP has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBP vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison

DBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, while PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBP
Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund
2.63%2.44%4.21%4.47%0.45%0.00%0.00%1.26%1.24%0.12%
PLTM
GraniteShares Platinum Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBP and PLTM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTM has higher volatility (11.52%) compared to DBP (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBP dropped -53.89% vs PLTM's -42.32%.

On 5-year performance, DBP leads with 16.74% vs 7.99% for PLTM. On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DBP has been the lower-risk option at 8.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBP has performed better with a 16.74% return vs 7.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBP.

DBP has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.

DBP tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return, while PLTM tracks Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for DBP and 0.50% for PLTM.

DBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBP and PLTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer