PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBOCX vs. BLNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBOCX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity Fund Class C (DBOCX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBOCX achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly lower than BLNDX's 11.97% return.


DBOCX

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.16%
6M
4.64%
YTD
4.64%
1Y
11.69%
3Y*
10.80%
5Y*
5.56%
10Y*
7.68%

BLNDX

1D
0.67%
1M
-4.28%
6M
11.97%
YTD
11.97%
1Y
26.96%
3Y*
9.98%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBOCX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DBOCX
BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity Fund Class C
4.64%11.80%10.69%16.12%-16.55%13.96%9.51%0.16%
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
11.97%4.12%13.11%5.79%3.71%20.16%16.30%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DBOCX and BLNDX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.63

The correlation between DBOCX and BLNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBOCX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBOCX
DBOCX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DBOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DBOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

BLNDX
BLNDX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BLNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BLNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBOCX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity Fund Class C (DBOCX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBOCXBLNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

3.77

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.24

14.17

-6.93

DBOCX vs. BLNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBOCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the BLNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBOCX and BLNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBOCX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBOCX drawdown since its inception was -43.06%, which is greater than BLNDX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBOCX and BLNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBOCXBLNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.06%

-17.69%

-25.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-7.24%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.61%

-17.69%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.71%

-17.69%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-5.53%

+4.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-3.21%

-2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.92%

-0.31%

Volatility

DBOCX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity Fund Class C (DBOCX) is 3.67%, while Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that DBOCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBOCXBLNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

4.19%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.59%

10.11%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.11%

12.92%

-3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.86%

11.75%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.28%

11.78%

+0.50%

DBOCX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBOCX has a 1.90% expense ratio, which is higher than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBOCX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison

DBOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than BLNDX's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
0.66%0.73%5.74%3.71%2.67%6.11%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBOCX
BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity Fund Class C
6.94%7.26%4.79%4.33%4.90%12.16%3.26%2.62%8.78%4.06%0.32%5.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBOCX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLNDX has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to DBOCX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBOCX dropped -43.06% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.

BLNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBOCX and BLNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer