DBND vs. MBS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DBND (DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF) and MBS (Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. DBND is passively managed, while MBS is actively managed. Over the past year, DBND returned 4.85% vs 6.88% for MBS. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBND charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MBS.

Performance

DBND vs. MBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBND achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than MBS's 0.62% return.

DBND

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: -0.21%
• 6M: -0.07%
• 1Y: 4.85%
• 3Y*: 4.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MBS

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: 0.62%
• 6M: 0.84%
• 1Y: 6.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBND vs. MBS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	-0.21%	7.41%	4.27%
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	0.62%	8.13%	5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between DBND and MBS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2024	0.69

The correlation between DBND and MBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DBND vs. MBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBND

DBND Risk / Return Rank: 39
DBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
DBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
DBND Omega Ratio Rank: 41
DBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
DBND Martin Ratio Rank: 34

MBS

MBS Risk / Return Rank: 69
MBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
MBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
MBS Omega Ratio Rank: 75
MBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
MBS Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBND vs. MBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBND	MBS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	2.36	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	3.54	-1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.45	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	3.14	-1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.10	9.89	-4.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBND vs. MBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the MBS Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBND and MBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBND	MBS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.48	2.36	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	1.60	-1.12

Drawdowns

DBND vs. MBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBND drawdown since its inception was -9.39%, which is greater than MBS's maximum drawdown of -4.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBND and MBS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBND	MBS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.39%	-4.09%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.83%	-2.20%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.80%	-1.46%	-0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-1.02%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	0.70%	+0.25%

Volatility

DBND vs. MBS - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) has a higher volatility of 1.07% compared to Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) at 0.90%. This indicates that DBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBND	MBS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.07%	0.90%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.33%	2.00%	+0.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.30%	2.93%	+0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.09%	3.99%	+1.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.09%	3.99%	+1.10%

DBND vs. MBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MBS's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBND vs. MBS - Dividend Comparison

DBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, less than MBS's 5.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	4.79%	4.78%	5.19%	4.39%	2.74%
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	5.61%	5.28%	4.52%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBND and MBS in my portfolio?

DBND and MBS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBND or MBS?

DBND has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to MBS (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBND dropped -9.39% vs MBS's -4.09%.

Which ETF is better, DBND or MBS?

On 1-year performance, MBS leads with 6.88% vs 4.85% for DBND. On fees, MBS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, MBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBND or MBS?

Over the 1-year period, MBS has performed better with a 6.88% return vs 4.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBND or MBS?

MBS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBND or MBS?

MBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 4.79% for DBND.

What is the main difference between DBND and MBS?

They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DBND and 0.49% for MBS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.