DBMF vs. PSCC
DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners, while PSCC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. DBMF is actively managed, while PSCC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBMF returned 7.93%/yr vs -0.20%/yr for PSCC. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBMF charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCC.
Performance
DBMF vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBMF achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than PSCC's 7.16% return.
DBMF
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 28.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.93%
- 10Y*
- —
PSCC
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- -2.82%
- 3Y*
- -1.02%
- 5Y*
- -0.20%
- 10Y*
- 6.30%
DBMF vs. PSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 9.70% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.67% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 7.16% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 7.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBMF and PSCC is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019 | 0.07 |
DBMF vs. PSCC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBMF
PSCC
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Technology
DBMF
PSCC
-
Healthcare
DBMF
PSCC
-
Financial Services
DBMF
PSCC
-
Consumer Cyclical
DBMF
PSCC
Communication Services
DBMF
PSCC
-
Industrials
DBMF
PSCC
Consumer Defensive
DBMF
PSCC
Energy
DBMF
PSCC
-
Real Estate
DBMF
PSCC
-
Utilities
DBMF
PSCC
-
Basic Materials
DBMF
PSCC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBMF vs. PSCC — Risk / Return Rank
DBMF
PSCC
DBMF vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBMF | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 0.99 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.58 | -0.13 | +4.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.82 | -0.22 | +17.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBMF | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | -0.12 | +2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | -0.01 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.56 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
DBMF vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBMF drawdown since its inception was -20.39%, smaller than the maximum PSCC drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMF and PSCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBMF | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.39% | -33.61% | +13.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -15.17% | +9.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.60% | -23.36% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -23.36% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -16.33% | +13.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -5.98% | -0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 8.68% | -7.02% |
Volatility
DBMF vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) is 2.88%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that DBMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBMF | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 4.71% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 10.80% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.35% | 16.50% | -4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.55% | 18.24% | -5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.43% | 19.29% | -6.86% |
DBMF vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBMF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCC's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBMF vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison
DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than PSCC's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.22% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 2.08% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBMF and PSCC have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCC has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to DBMF (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBMF dropped -20.39% vs PSCC's -33.61%.
On 5-year performance, DBMF leads with 7.93% vs -0.20% for PSCC. On fees, PSCC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DBMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBMF has performed better with a 7.93% return vs -0.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.
DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.22%, compared with 2.08% for PSCC.
DBMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while PSCC is Consumer Staples Equities. They also come from different issuers: iM Global Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBMF and 0.29% for PSCC.
DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBMF and PSCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer