PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBJP vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBJP vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBJP achieves a 20.51% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return. Over the past 10 years, DBJP has outperformed DBE with an annualized return of 16.54%, while DBE has yielded a comparatively lower 12.03% annualized return.


DBJP

1D
0.81%
1M
8.88%
YTD
20.51%
6M
24.02%
1Y
52.66%
3Y*
29.04%
5Y*
21.44%
10Y*
16.54%

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBJP vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
20.51%29.51%25.53%36.21%-4.19%13.04%10.53%20.87%-14.82%21.24%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-12.95%5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between DBJP and DBE is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011

0.18

The correlation between DBJP and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBJP vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBJP
DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBJP vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBJPDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.40

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.09

5.89

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.86

11.53

+8.33

DBJP vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBJP Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBJP and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBJPDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

2.43

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

0.67

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.43

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.09

+0.59

Drawdowns

DBJP vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBJP drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBJP and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBJPDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.30%

-86.69%

+55.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.39%

-14.41%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.50%

-23.89%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

-38.74%

+17.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.30%

-60.84%

+29.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-30.27%

+30.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-57.31%

+50.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

7.35%

-4.69%

Volatility

DBJP vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) is 3.85%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that DBJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBJPDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

12.95%

-9.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.79%

30.86%

-17.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.69%

34.97%

-16.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.93%

29.39%

-10.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.46%

28.33%

-8.87%

DBJP vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBJP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBJP vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than DBE's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
2.34%2.81%2.80%5.21%0.80%2.30%2.53%2.56%3.87%2.07%1.13%5.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBJP and DBE have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to DBJP (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBJP dropped -31.30% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 10-year performance, DBJP leads with 16.54% vs 12.03% for DBE. On fees, DBJP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DBJP has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 16.54% return vs 12.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBJP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 2.10% for DBE.

DBJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBJP and 0.78% for DBE.

DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBJP and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer