PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBI vs. BOOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DBI vs. BOOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Designer Brands Inc. (DBI) and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBI achieves a -19.35% return, which is significantly lower than BOOT's -0.75% return. Over the past 10 years, DBI has underperformed BOOT with an annualized return of -8.96%, while BOOT has yielded a comparatively higher 36.26% annualized return.


DBI

1D
-5.31%
1M
-20.20%
YTD
-19.35%
6M
-21.36%
1Y
169.42%
3Y*
-12.13%
5Y*
-17.56%
10Y*
-8.96%

BOOT

1D
-1.31%
1M
6.74%
YTD
-0.75%
6M
-7.47%
1Y
15.89%
3Y*
29.11%
5Y*
15.70%
10Y*
36.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBI vs. BOOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBI
Designer Brands Inc.
-19.35%46.47%-38.03%-7.73%-30.14%85.75%-50.65%-32.63%20.02%-1.55%
BOOT
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
-0.75%16.24%97.79%22.78%-49.19%183.79%-2.63%161.48%2.53%32.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DBI and BOOT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2014

0.48

The correlation between DBI and BOOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.50 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DBI:

$329.37M

BOOT:

$5.38B

EPS

DBI:

$0.44

BOOT:

$7.35

PE Ratio

DBI:

13.31

BOOT:

23.83

PEG Ratio

DBI:

1.04

BOOT:

4.87

PS Ratio

DBI:

0.10

BOOT:

2.39

PB Ratio

DBI:

1.17

BOOT:

4.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

DBI:

$2.90B

BOOT:

$2.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DBI:

$1.28B

BOOT:

$858.36M

EBITDA (TTM)

DBI:

$118.33M

BOOT:

$358.43M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBI vs. BOOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBI
DBI Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBI Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BOOT
BOOT Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
BOOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOOT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BOOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOOT Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBI vs. BOOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Designer Brands Inc. (DBI) and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBIBOOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.09

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

0.46

+3.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.04

1.12

+7.91

DBI vs. BOOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBI Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the BOOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBI and BOOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBI vs. BOOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBI drawdown since its inception was -93.49%, which is greater than BOOT's maximum drawdown of -83.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBI and BOOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBIBOOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.49%

-83.73%

-9.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.72%

-35.01%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-81.72%

-48.93%

-32.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.22%

-60.62%

-26.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.29%

-77.88%

-14.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.99%

-15.79%

-66.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.48%

-32.27%

-13.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.83%

14.18%

+4.65%

Volatility

DBI vs. BOOT - Volatility Comparison

Designer Brands Inc. (DBI) has a higher volatility of 30.78% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) at 13.05%. This indicates that DBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBIBOOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.78%

13.05%

+17.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.82%

33.68%

+18.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.06%

43.58%

+46.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.11%

49.96%

+23.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.96%

57.00%

+18.96%

Dividends

DBI vs. BOOT - Dividend Comparison

DBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, while BOOT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOOT
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBI
Designer Brands Inc.
3.40%2.69%3.75%2.26%2.04%0.00%1.31%6.35%4.05%3.74%3.53%3.35%

Financials

DBI vs. BOOT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Designer Brands Inc. and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M900.00M20222023202420252026
696.35M
538.75M
(DBI) Total Revenue
(BOOT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DBI vs. BOOT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Designer Brands Inc. and Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
45.3%
36.3%
Portfolio components
DBI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Designer Brands Inc. reported a gross profit of 315.32M and revenue of 696.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.3%.

BOOT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 195.75M and revenue of 538.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.

DBI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Designer Brands Inc. reported an operating income of 18.87M and revenue of 696.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.7%.

BOOT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.22M and revenue of 538.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.

DBI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Designer Brands Inc. reported a net income of 13.55M and revenue of 696.35M, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.

BOOT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 44.44M and revenue of 538.75M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DBI and BOOT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBI has higher volatility (30.78%) compared to BOOT (13.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBI dropped -93.49% vs BOOT's -83.73%.

DBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBI and BOOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer