PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEZ vs. NORW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEZ vs. NORW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEZ achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly lower than NORW's 26.31% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEZ has outperformed NORW with an annualized return of 11.73%, while NORW has yielded a comparatively lower 9.61% annualized return.


DBEZ

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.81%
YTD
9.52%
6M
11.46%
1Y
18.85%
3Y*
16.73%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
11.73%

NORW

1D
-0.52%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
26.31%
6M
31.64%
1Y
36.12%
3Y*
23.02%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
9.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEZ vs. NORW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBEZ
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF
9.52%26.14%9.51%21.78%-10.13%23.52%0.36%29.94%-10.81%15.62%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
26.31%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%26.00%14.39%-10.39%24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEZ and NORW is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2014

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between DBEZ and NORW has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DBEZ vs. NORW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBEZ
NORW

Financial Services

23.1%
22.6%

Industrials

21.9%
13.3%

Technology

14.2%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
0.2%

Utilities

6.6%
0.7%

Healthcare

5.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
12.5%

Basic Materials

4.6%
10.9%

Energy

4.4%
29.4%

Communication Services

4.0%
5.9%

Real Estate

1.4%
0.4%

Financial Services

DBEZ
23.1%
NORW
22.6%

Industrials

DBEZ
21.9%
NORW
13.3%

Technology

DBEZ
14.2%
NORW
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DBEZ
8.7%
NORW
0.2%

Utilities

DBEZ
6.6%
NORW
0.7%

Healthcare

DBEZ
5.7%
NORW

-

Consumer Defensive

DBEZ
5.3%
NORW
12.5%

Basic Materials

DBEZ
4.6%
NORW
10.9%

Energy

DBEZ
4.4%
NORW
29.4%

Communication Services

DBEZ
4.0%
NORW
5.9%

Real Estate

DBEZ
1.4%
NORW
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEZ vs. NORW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEZ
DBEZ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
DBEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEZ vs. NORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBEZNORWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.37

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

3.95

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.67

11.27

-4.60

DBEZ vs. NORW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the NORW Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEZ and NORW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBEZNORWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

2.18

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.37

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.46

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.40

+0.19

Drawdowns

DBEZ vs. NORW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEZ drawdown since its inception was -38.76%, which is greater than NORW's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEZ and NORW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEZNORWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.76%

-35.62%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-9.18%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.59%

-16.06%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.38%

-32.78%

+9.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.76%

-33.86%

-4.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-3.53%

+2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-10.13%

+4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

3.21%

-0.38%

Volatility

DBEZ vs. NORW - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) at 4.06%. This indicates that DBEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NORW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEZNORWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

4.06%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

12.73%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.57%

16.70%

-2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.43%

21.88%

-5.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

20.80%

-2.44%

DBEZ vs. NORW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEZ has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than NORW's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEZ vs. NORW - Dividend Comparison

DBEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than NORW's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEZ
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF
3.84%4.20%0.62%1.84%1.68%1.64%1.99%2.86%2.56%2.11%3.42%4.92%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
2.72%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBEZ and NORW have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBEZ has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to NORW (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEZ dropped -38.76% vs NORW's -35.62%.

On 10-year performance, DBEZ leads with 11.73% vs 9.61% for NORW. On fees, DBEZ is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBEZ has performed better with a 11.73% return vs 9.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBEZ is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for NORW.

DBEZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 2.72% for NORW.

DBEZ tracks MSCI EMU IMI 100% Hedged to USD Net Variant, while NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for DBEZ and 0.50% for NORW.

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEZ and NORW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer