DBEZ vs. DBJP
DBEZ (Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF) and DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU IMI 100% Hedged to USD Net Variant, while DBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBEZ returned 12.84%/yr vs 17.48%/yr for DBJP. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBEZ charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBJP.
Performance
DBEZ vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEZ achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 21.11% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEZ has underperformed DBJP with an annualized return of 12.84%, while DBJP has yielded a comparatively higher 17.48% annualized return.
DBEZ
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- 22.83%
- 3Y*
- 18.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
DBJP
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- YTD
- 21.11%
- 6M
- 21.43%
- 1Y
- 53.86%
- 3Y*
- 28.48%
- 5Y*
- 21.53%
- 10Y*
- 17.48%
DBEZ vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEZ Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF | 11.85% | 26.14% | 9.51% | 21.78% | -10.13% | 23.52% | 0.36% | 29.94% | -10.81% | 15.62% |
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 21.11% | 29.51% | 25.53% | 36.21% | -4.19% | 13.04% | 10.53% | 20.87% | -14.82% | 21.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEZ and DBJP is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014 | 0.69 |
The correlation between DBEZ and DBJP shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DBEZ vs. DBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBEZ
DBJP
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
DBEZ
DBJP
Industrials
DBEZ
DBJP
Technology
DBEZ
DBJP
Consumer Cyclical
DBEZ
DBJP
Utilities
DBEZ
DBJP
Healthcare
DBEZ
DBJP
Consumer Defensive
DBEZ
DBJP
Communication Services
DBEZ
DBJP
Basic Materials
DBEZ
DBJP
Energy
DBEZ
DBJP
Real Estate
DBEZ
DBJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBEZ vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank
DBEZ
DBJP
DBEZ vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBEZ | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.49 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 5.21 | -3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.22 | 19.84 | -11.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBEZ vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEZ drawdown since its inception was -38.76%, which is greater than DBJP's maximum drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEZ and DBJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEZ | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.76% | -31.30% | -7.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.03% | -10.39% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.59% | -21.50% | +5.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.38% | -21.50% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.76% | -31.30% | -7.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -4.26% | +2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -7.27% | +1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 2.72% | +0.07% |
Volatility
DBEZ vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) is 5.01%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a volatility of 7.91%. This indicates that DBEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBEZ | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 7.91% | -2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.69% | 15.44% | -2.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.06% | 19.90% | -4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 19.18% | -2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 19.30% | -1.17% |
DBEZ vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEZ has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBEZ vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison
DBEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than DBJP's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEZ Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF | 1.28% | 4.20% | 0.62% | 1.84% | 1.68% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 2.86% | 2.56% | 2.11% | 3.42% | 4.92% |
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 1.25% | 2.81% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBEZ and DBJP have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBJP has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to DBEZ (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEZ dropped -38.76% vs DBJP's -31.30%.
On 10-year performance, DBJP leads with 17.48% vs 12.84% for DBEZ. On fees, DBJP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DBEZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 17.48% return vs 12.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBJP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for DBEZ.
DBEZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.25% for DBJP.
DBEZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while DBJP is Japan Equities. DBEZ tracks MSCI EMU IMI 100% Hedged to USD Net Variant, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for DBEZ and 0.45% for DBJP.
DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBEZ and DBJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer