DBEF vs. RPAR
DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) and RPAR (RPAR Risk Parity ETF) are both Hedge Fund funds. DBEF is passively managed, while RPAR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBEF returned 13.11%/yr vs 1.76%/yr for RPAR. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBEF charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for RPAR.
Performance
DBEF vs. RPAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly higher than RPAR's 7.53% return.
DBEF
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- YTD
- 10.25%
- 6M
- 12.54%
- 1Y
- 24.51%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.12%
RPAR
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 7.53%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- —
DBEF vs. RPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 10.25% | 23.16% | 13.40% | 20.15% | -5.13% | 19.60% | 2.03% | 0.42% |
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF | 7.53% | 17.91% | 0.06% | 6.03% | -22.82% | 7.56% | 19.40% | 0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEF and RPAR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019 | 0.45 |
The correlation between DBEF and RPAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (5 years) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DBEF vs. RPAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBEF
RPAR
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DBEF
RPAR
Industrials
DBEF
RPAR
Healthcare
DBEF
RPAR
Technology
DBEF
RPAR
Consumer Cyclical
DBEF
RPAR
Consumer Defensive
DBEF
RPAR
Basic Materials
DBEF
RPAR
Communication Services
DBEF
RPAR
Energy
DBEF
RPAR
Utilities
DBEF
RPAR
Real Estate
DBEF
RPAR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBEF vs. RPAR — Risk / Return Rank
DBEF
RPAR
DBEF vs. RPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBEF | RPAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.37 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 2.63 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | 8.71 | +2.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBEF | RPAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 2.09 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.14 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.36 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
DBEF vs. RPAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, which is greater than RPAR's maximum drawdown of -30.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and RPAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEF | RPAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.46% | -30.16% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -8.10% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.62% | -13.20% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.95% | -30.16% | +15.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -2.64% | +2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.74% | -11.61% | +6.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 2.44% | -0.21% |
Volatility
DBEF vs. RPAR - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) at 3.56%. This indicates that DBEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBEF | RPAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 3.56% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 8.37% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.37% | 10.20% | +2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.74% | 12.40% | +1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 12.69% | +3.10% |
DBEF vs. RPAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEF has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than RPAR's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBEF vs. RPAR - Dividend Comparison
DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than RPAR's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 5.03% | 5.55% | 1.29% | 4.46% | 15.85% | 2.28% | 2.41% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 2.98% | 2.55% | 3.70% |
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF | 2.07% | 2.55% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 4.01% | 2.02% | 0.76% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBEF and RPAR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBEF has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to RPAR (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs RPAR's -30.16%.
On 5-year performance, DBEF leads with 13.11% vs 1.76% for RPAR. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, RPAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 13.11% return vs 1.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBEF is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for RPAR.
DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 2.07% for RPAR.
They also come from different issuers: DWS and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for DBEF and 0.51% for RPAR.
RPAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBEF and RPAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer