PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEF vs. RPAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEF vs. RPAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly higher than RPAR's 7.53% return.


DBEF

1D
-0.47%
1M
4.76%
YTD
10.25%
6M
12.54%
1Y
24.51%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
12.12%

RPAR

1D
-0.47%
1M
1.78%
YTD
7.53%
6M
7.10%
1Y
21.22%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEF vs. RPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
10.25%23.16%13.40%20.15%-5.13%19.60%2.03%0.42%
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
7.53%17.91%0.06%6.03%-22.82%7.56%19.40%0.11%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEF and RPAR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019

0.45

The correlation between DBEF and RPAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (5 years) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DBEF vs. RPAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBEF
RPAR

Financial Services

24.6%
35.9%

Industrials

19.9%
2.1%

Healthcare

10.5%
5.1%

Technology

10.3%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
0.3%

Basic Materials

5.9%
6.4%

Communication Services

4.5%
4.9%

Energy

4.1%
5.9%

Utilities

3.9%
0.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
-0.0%

Financial Services

DBEF
24.6%
RPAR
35.9%

Industrials

DBEF
19.9%
RPAR
2.1%

Healthcare

DBEF
10.5%
RPAR
5.1%

Technology

DBEF
10.3%
RPAR
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DBEF
7.5%
RPAR
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

DBEF
6.8%
RPAR
0.3%

Basic Materials

DBEF
5.9%
RPAR
6.4%

Communication Services

DBEF
4.5%
RPAR
4.9%

Energy

DBEF
4.1%
RPAR
5.9%

Utilities

DBEF
3.9%
RPAR
0.2%

Real Estate

DBEF
1.9%
RPAR
-0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEF vs. RPAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEF
DBEF Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DBEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

RPAR
RPAR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
RPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEF vs. RPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBEFRPARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.63

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.01

8.71

+2.30

DBEF vs. RPAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the RPAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEF and RPAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBEFRPARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.09

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.14

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.36

+0.19

Drawdowns

DBEF vs. RPAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, which is greater than RPAR's maximum drawdown of -30.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and RPAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEFRPARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.46%

-30.16%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-8.10%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.62%

-13.20%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

-30.16%

+15.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-2.64%

+2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-11.61%

+6.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

2.44%

-0.21%

Volatility

DBEF vs. RPAR - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) at 3.56%. This indicates that DBEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEFRPARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

3.56%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

8.37%

+1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

10.20%

+2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.74%

12.40%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

12.69%

+3.10%

DBEF vs. RPAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEF has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than RPAR's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEF vs. RPAR - Dividend Comparison

DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than RPAR's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
5.03%5.55%1.29%4.46%15.85%2.28%2.41%3.03%3.22%2.98%2.55%3.70%
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
2.07%2.55%2.51%3.16%4.01%2.02%0.76%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBEF and RPAR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBEF has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to RPAR (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs RPAR's -30.16%.

On 5-year performance, DBEF leads with 13.11% vs 1.76% for RPAR. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, RPAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 13.11% return vs 1.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBEF is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for RPAR.

DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 2.07% for RPAR.

They also come from different issuers: DWS and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for DBEF and 0.51% for RPAR.

RPAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEF and RPAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer