DBEF vs. IQLT
DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) and IQLT (iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DBEF tracks the MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index while IQLT tracks the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBEF returned 12.22%/yr vs 9.70%/yr for IQLT. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBEF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IQLT.
Performance
DBEF vs. IQLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 13.76% return, which is significantly higher than IQLT's 10.81% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEF has outperformed IQLT with an annualized return of 12.22%, while IQLT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.70% annualized return.
DBEF
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- YTD
- 13.76%
- 1Y
- 27.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.36%
IQLT
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 1Y
- 18.92%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.55%
DBEF vs. IQLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 13.76% | 23.16% | 13.40% | 20.15% | -5.13% | 19.60% | 2.03% | 24.94% | -9.52% | 16.74% |
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 10.81% | 25.42% | 1.54% | 18.73% | -15.22% | 12.94% | 12.48% | 28.18% | -10.76% | 24.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEF and IQLT is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2015 | 0.78 |
The correlation between DBEF and IQLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
DBEF vs. IQLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBEF
IQLT
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
DBEF
IQLT
Industrials
DBEF
IQLT
Technology
DBEF
IQLT
Healthcare
DBEF
IQLT
Consumer Cyclical
DBEF
IQLT
Consumer Defensive
DBEF
IQLT
Basic Materials
DBEF
IQLT
Communication Services
DBEF
IQLT
Utilities
DBEF
IQLT
Energy
DBEF
IQLT
Real Estate
DBEF
IQLT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBEF vs. IQLT — Risk / Return Rank
DBEF
IQLT
DBEF vs. IQLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBEF | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.22 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 1.83 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.22 | 6.95 | +5.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBEF vs. IQLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, roughly equal to the maximum IQLT drawdown of -32.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and IQLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEF | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.46% | -32.21% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -10.38% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.62% | -13.18% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.95% | -30.24% | +15.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.46% | -32.21% | -0.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -0.72% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -6.16% | +1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 2.73% | -0.48% |
Volatility
DBEF vs. IQLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) is 3.65%, while iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that DBEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBEF | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 3.98% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.13% | 12.95% | -1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.08% | 15.17% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 16.55% | -2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 16.76% | -1.18% |
DBEF vs. IQLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IQLT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBEF vs. IQLT - Dividend Comparison
DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than IQLT's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 2.29% | 5.55% | 1.29% | 4.46% | 15.85% | 2.28% | 2.41% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 2.98% | 2.55% | 3.70% |
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 2.41% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.27% | 3.14% | 2.24% | 1.61% | 2.28% | 2.72% | 2.36% | 2.91% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBEF and IQLT have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQLT has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to DBEF (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs IQLT's -32.21%.
On 10-year performance, DBEF leads with 12.22% vs 9.70% for IQLT. On fees, IQLT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DBEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 12.22% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQLT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for DBEF.
IQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 2.29% for DBEF.
DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DBEF and 0.30% for IQLT.
DBEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBEF and IQLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer