DBEF vs. FDVV
DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBEF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBEF returned 13.77%/yr vs 14.20%/yr for FDVV. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBEF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.
Performance
DBEF vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 13.76% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 11.33% return.
DBEF
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- YTD
- 13.76%
- 1Y
- 27.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.36%
FDVV
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 1Y
- 19.79%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 14.20%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.66%
DBEF vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 13.76% | 23.16% | 13.40% | 20.15% | -5.13% | 19.60% | 2.03% | 24.94% | -9.52% | 16.74% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 11.33% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 2.80% | 24.07% | -1.26% | 14.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEF and FDVV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.76 |
The correlation between DBEF and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
DBEF vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBEF
FDVV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
DBEF
FDVV
Industrials
DBEF
FDVV
Technology
DBEF
FDVV
Healthcare
DBEF
FDVV
Consumer Cyclical
DBEF
FDVV
Consumer Defensive
DBEF
FDVV
Basic Materials
DBEF
FDVV
-
Communication Services
DBEF
FDVV
Utilities
DBEF
FDVV
Energy
DBEF
FDVV
-
Real Estate
DBEF
FDVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBEF vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank
DBEF
FDVV
DBEF vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBEF | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.36 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.14 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.22 | 8.78 | +3.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBEF vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and FDVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEF | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.46% | -40.25% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -9.30% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.62% | -15.90% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.95% | -20.18% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -0.91% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -3.77% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 2.26% | -0.01% |
Volatility
DBEF vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 2.36%. This indicates that DBEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBEF | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 2.36% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.13% | 8.36% | +2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.08% | 10.17% | +2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 14.67% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 16.92% | -1.34% |
DBEF vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBEF vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison
DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than FDVV's 2.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 2.29% | 5.55% | 1.29% | 4.46% | 15.85% | 2.28% | 2.41% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 2.98% | 2.55% | 3.70% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.79% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBEF and FDVV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBEF has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to FDVV (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs FDVV's -40.25%.
On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 14.20% vs 13.77% for DBEF. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 14.20% return vs 13.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for DBEF.
FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 2.29% for DBEF.
DBEF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DBEF and 0.29% for FDVV.
DBEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBEF and FDVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer