PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEF vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEF vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 7.59% return.


DBEF

1D
0.82%
1M
1.44%
YTD
9.52%
6M
11.55%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
12.28%

FDVV

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.68%
YTD
7.59%
6M
7.85%
1Y
22.32%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
13.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEF vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
9.52%23.16%13.40%20.15%-5.13%19.60%2.03%24.94%-9.52%16.74%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
7.59%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEF and FDVV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.77

The correlation between DBEF and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBEF vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBEF
FDVV

Financial Services

24.6%
17.0%

Industrials

19.9%
3.4%

Healthcare

10.5%
3.1%

Technology

10.3%
29.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
11.0%

Basic Materials

5.9%

-

Communication Services

4.5%
3.7%

Energy

4.1%

-

Utilities

3.9%
8.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
10.1%

Financial Services

DBEF
24.6%
FDVV
17.0%

Industrials

DBEF
19.9%
FDVV
3.4%

Healthcare

DBEF
10.5%
FDVV
3.1%

Technology

DBEF
10.3%
FDVV
29.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DBEF
7.5%
FDVV
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

DBEF
6.8%
FDVV
11.0%

Basic Materials

DBEF
5.9%
FDVV

-

Communication Services

DBEF
4.5%
FDVV
3.7%

Energy

DBEF
4.1%
FDVV

-

Utilities

DBEF
3.9%
FDVV
8.7%

Real Estate

DBEF
1.9%
FDVV
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEF vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEF
DBEF Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DBEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEF vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBEFFDVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.41

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.41

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.24

10.00

+0.23

DBEF vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEF and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBEFFDVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.23

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.90

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.79

-0.24

Drawdowns

DBEF vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and FDVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEFFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.46%

-40.25%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-9.30%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.62%

-15.90%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

-20.18%

+5.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-1.85%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

-3.80%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.24%

0.00%

Volatility

DBEF vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 2.96%. This indicates that DBEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEFFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

2.96%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.41%

8.08%

+2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.59%

10.07%

+2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.78%

14.75%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.81%

16.99%

-1.18%

DBEF vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEF has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEF vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than FDVV's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
5.07%5.55%1.29%4.46%15.85%2.28%2.41%3.03%3.22%2.98%2.55%3.70%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.74%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBEF and FDVV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBEF has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to FDVV (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.25% vs 12.96% for DBEF. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.25% return vs 12.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for DBEF.

DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 5.07%, compared with 2.74% for FDVV.

DBEF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for DBEF and 0.29% for FDVV.

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEF and FDVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer