DBB vs. ILS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DBB (Invesco DB Base Metals Fund) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBB is a Metals fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Industrial Metals Index Excess Return, while ILS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Brookmont. DBB is passively managed, while ILS is actively managed. Over the past year, DBB returned 43.95% vs 7.59% for ILS. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. DBB charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.

Performance

DBB vs. ILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Base Metals Fund (DBB) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBB achieves a 14.30% return, which is significantly higher than ILS's 1.73% return.

DBB

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 4.67%
• YTD: 14.30%
• 6M: 21.27%
• 1Y: 43.95%
• 3Y*: 19.22%
• 5Y*: 8.23%
• 10Y*: 9.46%

ILS

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 6M: 2.17%
• 1Y: 7.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBB vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DBB Invesco DB Base Metals Fund	14.30%	23.76%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	1.73%	5.60%

Correlation

The correlation between DBB and ILS is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025	-0.06

Return for Risk

DBB vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBB

DBB Risk / Return Rank: 76
DBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
DBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
DBB Omega Ratio Rank: 72
DBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
DBB Martin Ratio Rank: 80

ILS

ILS Risk / Return Rank: 93
ILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
ILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ILS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
ILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ILS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBB vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Base Metals Fund (DBB) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBB	ILS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	2.75	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	4.51	-1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.61	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	13.78	-9.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.35	46.06	-30.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBB vs. ILS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBB Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the ILS Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBB and ILS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBB	ILS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	2.75	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	1.87	-1.79

Drawdowns

DBB vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBB drawdown since its inception was -60.20%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -1.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBB and ILS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBB	ILS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.20%	-1.56%	-58.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.00%	-0.55%	-10.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.54%	-0.08%	-1.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.89%	-0.25%	-30.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	0.17%	+2.70%

Volatility

DBB vs. ILS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DB Base Metals Fund (DBB) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) at 0.88%. This indicates that DBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBB	ILS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.49%	0.88%	+4.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.72%	1.69%	+14.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.99%	2.77%	+15.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.24%	3.38%	+16.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.47%	3.38%	+15.09%

DBB vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBB has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBB vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison

DBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than ILS's 8.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBB Invesco DB Base Metals Fund	2.29%	2.61%	4.75%	7.21%	0.94%	0.00%	0.00%	1.83%	1.59%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	8.10%	6.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBB and ILS in my portfolio?

DBB and ILS have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBB or ILS?

DBB has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to ILS (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBB dropped -60.20% vs ILS's -1.56%.

Which ETF is better, DBB or ILS?

On 1-year performance, DBB leads with 43.95% vs 7.59% for ILS. On fees, DBB is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, ILS has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBB or ILS?

Over the 1-year period, DBB has performed better with a 43.95% return vs 7.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBB or ILS?

DBB is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBB or ILS?

ILS has the higher dividend yield at 8.10%, compared with 2.29% for DBB.

What is the main difference between DBB and ILS?

DBB is categorized as Metals, while ILS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DBB and 1.58% for ILS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.