PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBB vs. DBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBB vs. DBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Base Metals Fund (DBB) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBB achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly higher than DBA's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, DBB has outperformed DBA with an annualized return of 9.08%, while DBA has yielded a comparatively lower 2.98% annualized return.


DBB

1D
-0.97%
1M
0.39%
YTD
10.81%
6M
18.37%
1Y
40.01%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
9.08%

DBA

1D
-0.19%
1M
-6.04%
YTD
2.98%
6M
3.14%
1Y
-0.59%
3Y*
11.83%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
2.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBB vs. DBA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBB
Invesco DB Base Metals Fund
10.81%25.01%7.90%1.15%-11.80%28.97%15.53%-1.17%-19.47%30.09%
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
2.98%-0.56%33.45%7.64%2.53%22.37%-2.54%-0.71%-8.74%-6.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DBB and DBA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2007

0.30

The correlation between DBB and DBA shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DBB vs. DBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBB
DBA

Financial Services

98.8%
13.7%

Basic Materials

-

10.7%

Communication Services

-

7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.8%

Energy

-

5.3%

Healthcare

-

16.8%

Industrials

-

15.2%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Technology

-

6.3%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Financial Services

DBB
98.8%
DBA
13.7%

Basic Materials

DBB

-

DBA
10.7%

Communication Services

DBB

-

DBA
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DBB

-

DBA
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

DBB

-

DBA
8.8%

Energy

DBB

-

DBA
5.3%

Healthcare

DBB

-

DBA
16.8%

Industrials

DBB

-

DBA
15.2%

Real Estate

DBB

-

DBA
1.1%

Technology

DBB

-

DBA
6.3%

Utilities

DBB

-

DBA
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBB vs. DBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBB
DBB Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBB Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBB Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

DBA
DBA Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
DBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBA Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBA Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBB vs. DBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Base Metals Fund (DBB) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBBDBADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.00

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

-0.07

+3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.81

-0.15

+13.96

DBB vs. DBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBB Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the DBA Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBB and DBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBBDBADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

-0.06

+2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.66

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.23

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.07

0.00

Drawdowns

DBB vs. DBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBB drawdown since its inception was -60.20%, smaller than the maximum DBA drawdown of -67.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBB and DBA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBBDBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.20%

-67.97%

+7.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.00%

-8.53%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.59%

-12.36%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.00%

-15.94%

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.98%

-40.72%

+2.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.54%

-27.50%

+22.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.87%

-41.09%

+10.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

4.13%

-1.23%

Volatility

DBB vs. DBA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DB Base Metals Fund (DBB) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) at 3.99%. This indicates that DBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBBDBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

3.99%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.90%

6.58%

+9.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.21%

10.71%

+7.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.27%

14.09%

+6.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.48%

13.07%

+5.41%

DBB vs. DBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBB has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than DBA's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBB vs. DBA - Dividend Comparison

DBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than DBA's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
3.47%3.58%4.08%4.63%0.48%0.00%0.00%1.55%1.06%
DBB
Invesco DB Base Metals Fund
2.36%2.61%4.75%7.21%0.94%0.00%0.00%1.83%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBB and DBA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBB has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to DBA (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBB dropped -60.20% vs DBA's -67.97%.

On 10-year performance, DBB leads with 9.08% vs 2.98% for DBA. On fees, DBB is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, DBA has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBB has performed better with a 9.08% return vs 2.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBB is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for DBA.

DBA has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 2.36% for DBB.

DBB is categorized as Metals, while DBA is Agricultural Commodities. DBB tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Industrial Metals Index Excess Return, while DBA tracks DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index TR. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DBB and 0.94% for DBA.

DBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBB and DBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer