PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBAW vs. IDVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBAW vs. IDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBAW achieves a 16.14% return, which is significantly higher than IDVO's 11.71% return.


DBAW

1D
-2.70%
1M
2.62%
YTD
16.14%
6M
16.41%
1Y
35.60%
3Y*
21.48%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
11.99%

IDVO

1D
-1.65%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
11.71%
6M
10.97%
1Y
32.71%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBAW vs. IDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
16.14%26.47%14.35%16.26%-2.50%
IDVO
Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
11.71%36.46%10.16%17.53%6.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DBAW and IDVO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022

0.83

The correlation between DBAW and IDVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBAW vs. IDVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBAW
IDVO

Financial Services

23.2%
19.9%

Technology

22.4%
10.7%

Industrials

14.3%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
3.2%

Basic Materials

6.9%
17.1%

Healthcare

6.8%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
8.2%

Communication Services

4.9%
10.3%

Energy

4.8%
12.5%

Utilities

2.9%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Financial Services

DBAW
23.2%
IDVO
19.9%

Technology

DBAW
22.4%
IDVO
10.7%

Industrials

DBAW
14.3%
IDVO
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DBAW
7.6%
IDVO
3.2%

Basic Materials

DBAW
6.9%
IDVO
17.1%

Healthcare

DBAW
6.8%
IDVO
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

DBAW
5.0%
IDVO
8.2%

Communication Services

DBAW
4.9%
IDVO
10.3%

Energy

DBAW
4.8%
IDVO
12.5%

Utilities

DBAW
2.9%
IDVO
3.2%

Real Estate

DBAW
1.4%
IDVO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBAW vs. IDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

IDVO
IDVO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBAW vs. IDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBAWIDVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.37

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

3.17

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.14

12.03

+4.11

DBAW vs. IDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBAW Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the IDVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBAW and IDVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBAW vs. IDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBAW drawdown since its inception was -31.44%, which is greater than IDVO's maximum drawdown of -15.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBAW and IDVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBAWIDVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.44%

-15.46%

-15.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-10.37%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.11%

-15.46%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-3.34%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-2.30%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.73%

-0.52%

Volatility

DBAW vs. IDVO - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) at 6.04%. This indicates that DBAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBAWIDVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.39%

6.04%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

13.94%

-1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.01%

16.37%

-2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.97%

16.49%

-2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.21%

16.49%

-1.28%

DBAW vs. IDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBAW has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than IDVO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBAW vs. IDVO - Dividend Comparison

DBAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than IDVO's 5.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
1.69%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%
IDVO
Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
5.60%5.42%6.14%5.72%1.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBAW and IDVO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBAW has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to IDVO (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBAW dropped -31.44% vs IDVO's -15.46%.

On 3-year performance, IDVO leads with 21.99% vs 21.48% for DBAW. On fees, DBAW is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, IDVO has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IDVO has performed better with a 21.99% return vs 21.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBAW is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IDVO.

IDVO has the higher dividend yield at 5.60%, compared with 1.69% for DBAW.

DBAW is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IDVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DBAW and 0.65% for IDVO.

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBAW and IDVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer