PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBAW vs. HDEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBAW vs. HDEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBAW achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly higher than HDEF's 11.93% return. Over the past 10 years, DBAW has outperformed HDEF with an annualized return of 10.99%, while HDEF has yielded a comparatively lower 9.03% annualized return.


DBAW

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.39%
6M
9.89%
YTD
15.50%
1Y
31.91%
3Y*
20.32%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
10.99%
ALL TIME*
9.39%

HDEF

1D
-0.35%
1M
3.34%
6M
7.69%
YTD
11.93%
1Y
23.18%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
9.03%
ALL TIME*
8.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.39M$1.84M$1.16M
$3.48M$3.76M$5.72M

DBAW vs. HDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
15.50%26.47%14.35%16.26%-13.35%13.08%7.44%22.96%-10.38%18.79%
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
11.93%33.01%2.85%18.53%-2.51%6.95%-1.90%25.02%-13.74%9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between DBAW and HDEF is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2015

0.67

The correlation between DBAW and HDEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.71 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DBAW vs. HDEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBAW
HDEF

Financial Services

23.9%
27.2%

Technology

23.5%
0.6%

Industrials

13.9%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
3.8%

Healthcare

6.9%
17.2%

Basic Materials

6.3%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
20.0%

Communication Services

4.7%
3.7%

Energy

4.4%
10.4%

Utilities

3.0%
8.1%

Real Estate

1.3%
0.8%

Financial Services

DBAW
23.9%
HDEF
27.2%

Technology

DBAW
23.5%
HDEF
0.6%

Industrials

DBAW
13.9%
HDEF
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DBAW
7.1%
HDEF
3.8%

Healthcare

DBAW
6.9%
HDEF
17.2%

Basic Materials

DBAW
6.3%
HDEF
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

DBAW
5.0%
HDEF
20.0%

Communication Services

DBAW
4.7%
HDEF
3.7%

Energy

DBAW
4.4%
HDEF
10.4%

Utilities

DBAW
3.0%
HDEF
8.1%

Real Estate

DBAW
1.3%
HDEF
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBAW vs. HDEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

HDEF
HDEF Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DBAW vs. HDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBAWHDEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.37

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

2.90

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.08

8.29

+4.79

DBAW vs. HDEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBAW Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the HDEF Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBAW and HDEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBAW vs. HDEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBAW drawdown since its inception was -31.44%, smaller than the maximum HDEF drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBAW and HDEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBAWHDEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.44%

-36.43%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-8.03%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.11%

-11.15%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

-23.63%

+5.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

-36.43%

+4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.24%

-1.30%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-5.02%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.80%

-0.35%

Volatility

DBAW vs. HDEF - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) at 2.63%. This indicates that DBAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBAWHDEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

2.63%

+2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.92%

9.46%

+3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

11.63%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.05%

14.15%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.22%

16.14%

-0.92%

DBAW vs. HDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBAW has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than HDEF's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBAW vs. HDEF - Dividend Comparison

DBAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than HDEF's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
1.70%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.71%3.88%4.53%4.38%5.41%4.76%3.93%4.20%3.55%3.38%9.53%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBAW and HDEF have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBAW has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to HDEF (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBAW dropped -31.44% vs HDEF's -36.43%.

On 10-year performance, DBAW leads with 10.99% vs 9.03% for HDEF. On fees, HDEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBAW has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

HDEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 1.70% for DBAW.

DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index, while HDEF tracks MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DBAW and 0.20% for HDEF.

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBAW and HDEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer