PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBAW vs. FPXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBAW vs. FPXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBAW achieves a 16.12% return, which is significantly lower than FPXI's 34.41% return. Over the past 10 years, DBAW has underperformed FPXI with an annualized return of 11.44%, while FPXI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.89% annualized return.


DBAW

1D
-0.51%
1M
6.28%
YTD
16.12%
6M
18.39%
1Y
36.60%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
11.44%

FPXI

1D
-0.36%
1M
13.37%
YTD
34.41%
6M
33.60%
1Y
49.62%
3Y*
27.44%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
12.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBAW vs. FPXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
16.12%26.47%14.35%16.26%-13.35%13.08%7.44%22.96%-10.38%18.79%
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
34.41%26.37%12.62%9.56%-31.83%-15.73%71.50%33.69%-13.07%39.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DBAW and FPXI is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2014

0.70

The correlation between DBAW and FPXI shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DBAW vs. FPXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBAW
FPXI

Financial Services

24.1%
5.0%

Technology

18.7%
31.4%

Industrials

15.0%
22.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
7.2%

Healthcare

7.2%
11.9%

Basic Materials

6.8%
14.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
0.8%

Energy

5.3%
2.3%

Communication Services

5.0%
2.5%

Utilities

3.2%
0.9%

Real Estate

1.5%
0.6%

Financial Services

DBAW
24.1%
FPXI
5.0%

Technology

DBAW
18.7%
FPXI
31.4%

Industrials

DBAW
15.0%
FPXI
22.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DBAW
7.9%
FPXI
7.2%

Healthcare

DBAW
7.2%
FPXI
11.9%

Basic Materials

DBAW
6.8%
FPXI
14.8%

Consumer Defensive

DBAW
5.3%
FPXI
0.8%

Energy

DBAW
5.3%
FPXI
2.3%

Communication Services

DBAW
5.0%
FPXI
2.5%

Utilities

DBAW
3.2%
FPXI
0.9%

Real Estate

DBAW
1.5%
FPXI
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBAW vs. FPXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FPXI
FPXI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FPXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FPXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPXI Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBAW vs. FPXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBAWFPXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.35

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

3.38

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.97

11.66

+5.31

DBAW vs. FPXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBAW Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the FPXI Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBAW and FPXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBAWFPXIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

2.13

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.19

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.61

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.48

+0.15

Drawdowns

DBAW vs. FPXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBAW drawdown since its inception was -31.44%, smaller than the maximum FPXI drawdown of -55.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBAW and FPXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBAWFPXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.44%

-55.78%

+24.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-14.77%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.11%

-20.58%

+6.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

-50.75%

+32.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

-55.78%

+24.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.36%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-20.26%

+15.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

4.27%

-2.11%

Volatility

DBAW vs. FPXI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) is 4.71%, while First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that DBAW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBAWFPXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

8.88%

-4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

19.74%

-8.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

23.42%

-10.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.74%

21.57%

-7.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.28%

21.18%

-5.90%

DBAW vs. FPXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBAW has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than FPXI's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBAW vs. FPXI - Dividend Comparison

DBAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than FPXI's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
3.29%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
0.59%0.70%0.93%0.71%1.13%0.71%0.18%0.67%1.75%0.75%2.09%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBAW and FPXI have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPXI has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to DBAW (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBAW dropped -31.44% vs FPXI's -55.78%.

On 10-year performance, FPXI leads with 12.89% vs 11.44% for DBAW. On fees, DBAW is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, DBAW has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FPXI has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBAW is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FPXI.

DBAW has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.59% for FPXI.

DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index, while FPXI tracks IPOX International Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DBAW and 0.70% for FPXI.

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBAW and FPXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer