PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBAW vs. FIFVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBAW vs. FIFVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and Fidelity Advisor Founders Fund Class I (FIFVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBAW achieves a 16.12% return, which is significantly higher than FIFVX's 9.17% return.


DBAW

1D
-0.51%
1M
6.28%
YTD
16.12%
6M
18.39%
1Y
36.60%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
11.44%

FIFVX

1D
-0.75%
1M
6.76%
YTD
9.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.83%
3Y*
25.49%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBAW vs. FIFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
16.12%26.47%14.35%16.26%-13.35%13.08%7.44%11.23%
FIFVX
Fidelity Advisor Founders Fund Class I
9.17%16.39%36.46%34.03%-26.71%19.10%47.20%14.05%

Correlation

The correlation between DBAW and FIFVX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019

0.76

The correlation between DBAW and FIFVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBAW vs. FIFVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FIFVX
FIFVX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FIFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FIFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBAW vs. FIFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and Fidelity Advisor Founders Fund Class I (FIFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBAWFIFVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.30

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

2.00

+2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.97

8.12

+8.85

DBAW vs. FIFVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBAW Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the FIFVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBAW and FIFVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBAWFIFVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

1.66

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.63

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.82

-0.19

Drawdowns

DBAW vs. FIFVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBAW drawdown since its inception was -31.44%, roughly equal to the maximum FIFVX drawdown of -32.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBAW and FIFVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBAWFIFVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.44%

-32.48%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-12.27%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.11%

-23.26%

+9.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

-32.48%

+14.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.75%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-7.99%

+2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

3.02%

-0.86%

Volatility

DBAW vs. FIFVX - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and Fidelity Advisor Founders Fund Class I (FIFVX) have volatilities of 4.71% and 4.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBAWFIFVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

4.74%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

11.40%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

14.79%

-1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.74%

21.18%

-7.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.28%

22.59%

-7.31%

DBAW vs. FIFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBAW has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than FIFVX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBAW vs. FIFVX - Dividend Comparison

DBAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than FIFVX's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
3.29%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%
FIFVX
Fidelity Advisor Founders Fund Class I
2.20%2.40%6.32%0.15%2.60%6.25%0.00%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBAW and FIFVX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIFVX has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to DBAW (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBAW dropped -31.44% vs FIFVX's -32.48%.

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBAW and FIFVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer