DAX vs. VIG
DAX (Global X DAX Germany ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAX is a Europe Equities fund tracking the DAX Index, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DAX returned 9.57%/yr vs 13.24%/yr for VIG. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DAX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
DAX vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAX achieves a -1.45% return, which is significantly lower than VIG's 7.68% return. Over the past 10 years, DAX has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 9.57%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.24% annualized return.
DAX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- -1.45%
- 6M
- -0.46%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
VIG
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 19.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.24%
DAX vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF | -1.45% | 39.00% | 10.55% | 23.62% | -18.47% | 7.73% | 12.27% | 22.11% | -22.92% | 28.23% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.68% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAX and VIG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2014 | 0.63 |
The correlation between DAX and VIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
DAX vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DAX
VIG
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Industrials
DAX
VIG
Financial Services
DAX
VIG
Technology
DAX
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
DAX
VIG
Communication Services
DAX
VIG
Healthcare
DAX
VIG
Basic Materials
DAX
VIG
Utilities
DAX
VIG
Consumer Defensive
DAX
VIG
Real Estate
DAX
VIG
-
Energy
DAX
-
VIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAX vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
DAX
VIG
DAX vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DAX | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.32 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 2.32 | -2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | 9.34 | -8.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DAX vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAX drawdown since its inception was -45.58%, roughly equal to the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAX and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAX | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.58% | -46.81% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.82% | -7.91% | -6.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.03% | -14.95% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.72% | -20.39% | -19.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.58% | -31.72% | -13.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.39% | -0.33% | -5.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -5.51% | -4.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.77% | 1.96% | +2.81% |
Volatility
DAX vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.93%. This indicates that DAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAX | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 2.93% | +2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.79% | 7.78% | +7.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 10.19% | +7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 14.25% | +6.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 16.06% | +5.19% |
DAX vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DAX vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
DAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than VIG's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF | 1.50% | 1.47% | 2.24% | 2.48% | 2.80% | 2.65% | 2.25% | 2.47% | 3.33% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.41% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DAX and VIG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DAX has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to VIG (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAX dropped -45.58% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.24% vs 9.57% for DAX. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.24% return vs 9.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for DAX.
DAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.
DAX is categorized as Europe Equities, while VIG is Dividend. DAX tracks DAX Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DAX and 0.04% for VIG.
VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DAX and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer