DAT vs. WNTR
DAT (ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the FactSet Big Data Refiners Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. DAT is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, DAT returned 0.18% vs 107.38% for WNTR. Their -0.44 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DAT charges 0.58%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for WNTR.
Performance
DAT vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAT achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.75% return.
DAT
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- 14.86%
- YTD
- -1.35%
- 1Y
- 0.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.95%
WNTR
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 107.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 47.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $131.25K | $91.17K | $103.64K | |
| $4.02M | $3.86M | $3.95M |
DAT vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DAT ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF | -1.35% | 8.00% |
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 10.75% | 52.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAT and WNTR is -0.44, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | -0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAT vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank
DAT
WNTR
DAT vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DAT | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.32 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 2.71 | -2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 6.87 | -7.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DAT vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAT drawdown since its inception was -56.22%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAT and WNTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAT | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.22% | -42.65% | -13.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.70% | -42.65% | +7.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.44% | -9.64% | +1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.76% | -20.18% | -5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.90% | 16.81% | -0.91% |
Volatility
DAT vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) is 8.43%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that DAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAT | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.43% | 14.85% | -6.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.48% | 47.43% | -20.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.69% | 54.68% | -22.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.94% | 53.42% | -19.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.94% | 53.42% | -19.48% |
DAT vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
DAT vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison
DAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 107.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DAT ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 107.02% | 58.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DAT and WNTR have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WNTR has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to DAT (8.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAT dropped -56.22% vs WNTR's -42.65%.
On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 107.38% vs 0.18% for DAT. On fees, DAT is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, DAT has been the lower-risk option at 8.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 107.38% return vs 0.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DAT is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.
WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.02%, compared with 0.00% for DAT.
DAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DAT and 1.00% for WNTR.
WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DAT and WNTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer