PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAT vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DAT vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DAT vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
-24.83%3.49%33.22%51.76%-44.33%-3.78%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
-20.81%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%33.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAT achieves a -24.83% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's -20.81% return.


DAT

1D
2.47%
1M
-6.54%
YTD
-24.83%
6M
-28.77%
1Y
-13.31%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
10.00%
1M
-15.69%
YTD
-20.81%
6M
-19.12%
1Y
46.49%
3Y*
45.09%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
34.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DAT vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DAT vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAT
DAT Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
DAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
DAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAT vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DATTQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.42

0.69

-1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.42

1.37

-1.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.19

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

1.25

-1.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.27

3.87

-5.14

DAT vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAT and TQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DATTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

0.69

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.64

-0.75

Correlation

The correlation between DAT and TQQQ is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DAT vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

DAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.76%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Drawdowns

DAT vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAT drawdown since its inception was -56.22%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAT and TQQQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DATTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.22%

-81.66%

+25.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.89%

-36.97%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.23%

-30.66%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.38%

-18.66%

-7.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.70%

12.00%

-0.30%

Volatility

DAT vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) is 7.86%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 19.43%. This indicates that DAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DATTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

19.43%

-11.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.08%

38.32%

-18.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.52%

67.26%

-35.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.61%

66.55%

-32.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.61%

65.83%

-32.22%