DAT vs. PSI
DAT (ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF) and PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the FactSet Big Data Refiners Index, while PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DAT returned 16.04%/yr vs 57.01%/yr for PSI. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DAT charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PSI.
Performance
DAT vs. PSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAT achieves a -3.11% return, which is significantly lower than PSI's 107.72% return.
DAT
- 1D
- -4.79%
- 1M
- 16.04%
- YTD
- -3.11%
- 6M
- -3.15%
- 1Y
- -3.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSI
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 21.18%
- YTD
- 107.72%
- 6M
- 104.36%
- 1Y
- 208.96%
- 3Y*
- 57.01%
- 5Y*
- 31.86%
- 10Y*
- 34.28%
DAT vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAT ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF | -3.11% | 3.49% | 33.22% | 51.76% | -44.33% | -3.78% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 107.72% | 36.32% | 17.17% | 49.06% | -34.43% | 20.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAT and PSI is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DAT and PSI has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DAT vs. PSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DAT
PSI
Technology
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
DAT
PSI
Communication Services
DAT
PSI
-
Utilities
DAT
PSI
-
Healthcare
DAT
PSI
-
Basic Materials
DAT
-
PSI
-
Consumer Cyclical
DAT
-
PSI
-
Consumer Defensive
DAT
-
PSI
-
Energy
DAT
-
PSI
-
Financial Services
DAT
-
PSI
-
Industrials
DAT
-
PSI
Real Estate
DAT
-
PSI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAT vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank
DAT
PSI
DAT vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAT | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.69 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 13.59 | -13.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 49.28 | -49.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAT | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 | 5.58 | -5.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.59 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
DAT vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAT drawdown since its inception was -56.22%, smaller than the maximum PSI drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAT and PSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAT | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.22% | -62.96% | +6.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.70% | -15.48% | -19.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.73% | -41.07% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.08% | 0.00% | -10.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.23% | -15.94% | -10.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.10% | 4.26% | +10.84% |
Volatility
DAT vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) have volatilities of 13.55% and 13.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAT | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.55% | 13.60% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.18% | 30.09% | -4.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.78% | 37.75% | -7.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.02% | 37.85% | -3.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.02% | 35.09% | -1.07% |
DAT vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
DAT vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison
DAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAT ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DAT and PSI have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSI has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to DAT (13.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAT dropped -56.22% vs PSI's -62.96%.
On 3-year performance, PSI leads with 57.01% vs 16.04% for DAT. On fees, PSI is cheaper at 0.56% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PSI has performed better with a 57.01% return vs 16.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSI is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DAT.
PSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for DAT.
DAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while PSI is Semiconductors. DAT tracks FactSet Big Data Refiners Index, while PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DAT and 0.56% for PSI.
PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.58 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DAT and PSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer