PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DASTY vs. XIACY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DASTY vs. XIACY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dassault Systemes SA (DASTY) and Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DASTY achieves a -19.73% return, which is significantly higher than XIACY's -28.58% return.


DASTY

1D
-2.43%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
-19.73%
6M
-18.08%
1Y
-39.21%
3Y*
-20.14%
5Y*
-12.84%
10Y*
4.17%

XIACY

1D
-4.00%
1M
-8.49%
YTD
-28.58%
6M
-30.27%
1Y
-47.21%
3Y*
37.83%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DASTY vs. XIACY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DASTY
Dassault Systemes SA
-19.73%-18.30%-29.32%37.87%-39.81%27.23%
XIACY
Xiaomi Corporation
-28.58%15.23%118.16%45.75%-42.42%-33.33%

Correlation

The correlation between DASTY and XIACY is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DASTY:

$29.44B

XIACY:

$95.17B

EPS

DASTY:

$0.92

XIACY:

$6.64

PE Ratio

DASTY:

23.92

XIACY:

2.71

PEG Ratio

DASTY:

2.04

XIACY:

0.02

PS Ratio

DASTY:

4.76

XIACY:

0.22

PB Ratio

DASTY:

3.19

XIACY:

0.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

DASTY:

$6.17B

XIACY:

$442.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DASTY:

$5.18B

XIACY:

$97.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

DASTY:

$2.12B

XIACY:

$40.74B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DASTY vs. XIACY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DASTY
DASTY Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
DASTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DASTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DASTY Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
DASTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
DASTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

XIACY
XIACY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
XIACY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIACY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIACY Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
XIACY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIACY Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DASTY vs. XIACY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dassault Systemes SA (DASTY) and Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DASTYXIACYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

0.79

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

-0.87

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.34

-1.40

+0.06

DASTY vs. XIACY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DASTY Sharpe Ratio is -1.05, which is comparable to the XIACY Sharpe Ratio of -1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DASTY and XIACY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DASTYXIACYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.05

-1.22

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.00

+0.22

Drawdowns

DASTY vs. XIACY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DASTY drawdown since its inception was -69.27%, roughly equal to the maximum XIACY drawdown of -70.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DASTY and XIACY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DASTYXIACYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.27%

-70.71%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.91%

-54.71%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.12%

-54.71%

-8.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.90%

-54.43%

-9.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.33%

-38.84%

+17.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.34%

33.80%

-4.46%

Volatility

DASTY vs. XIACY - Volatility Comparison

Dassault Systemes SA (DASTY) and Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) have volatilities of 11.82% and 12.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DASTYXIACYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.82%

12.01%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.54%

27.21%

+5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.60%

39.02%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.72%

46.57%

-14.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.99%

46.57%

-16.58%

Dividends

DASTY vs. XIACY - Dividend Comparison

DASTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while XIACY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DASTY
Dassault Systemes SA
1.44%1.06%0.72%0.47%0.51%0.23%0.37%0.44%0.59%1.14%1.32%
XIACY
Xiaomi Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

DASTY vs. XIACY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dassault Systemes SA and Xiaomi Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
1.51B
98.54B
(DASTY) Total Revenue
(XIACY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DASTY vs. XIACY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dassault Systemes SA and Xiaomi Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
84.0%
22.0%
Portfolio components
DASTY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dassault Systemes SA reported a gross profit of 1.27B and revenue of 1.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.0%.

XIACY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a gross profit of 21.68B and revenue of 98.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.

DASTY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dassault Systemes SA reported an operating income of 347.60M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.

XIACY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported an operating income of 2.93B and revenue of 98.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.

DASTY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dassault Systemes SA reported a net income of 292.50M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.

XIACY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a net income of 4.69B and revenue of 98.54B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DASTY and XIACY have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XIACY has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to DASTY (11.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DASTY dropped -69.27% vs XIACY's -70.71%.

DASTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.05 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DASTY and XIACY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer