DASH vs. LUN.TO
DASH (DoorDash, Inc.) and LUN.TO (Lundin Mining Corporation) are both stocks. DASH operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while LUN.TO operates in Copper (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, DASH returned -0.47%/yr vs 24.40%/yr for LUN.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DASH vs. LUN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DASH is traded in USD, while LUN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LUN.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DASH achieves a -33.51% return, which is significantly lower than LUN.TO's 25.85% return.
DASH
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- -33.51%
- 6M
- -33.81%
- 1Y
- -30.48%
- 3Y*
- 27.20%
- 5Y*
- -0.47%
- 10Y*
- —
LUN.TO
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -11.71%
- YTD
- 25.85%
- 6M
- 37.25%
- 1Y
- 165.16%
- 3Y*
- 56.10%
- 5Y*
- 24.40%
- 10Y*
- 26.76%
DASH vs. LUN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DASH DoorDash, Inc. | -33.51% | 35.01% | 69.63% | 102.56% | -67.21% | 4.31% | -21.57% |
LUN.TO Lundin Mining Corporation | 25.85% | 153.43% | 8.53% | 38.98% | -17.00% | -9.30% | 14.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between DASH and LUN.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.21 |
The correlation between DASH and LUN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DASH:
$66.61B
LUN.TO:
CA$32.59B
DASH:
$2.10
LUN.TO:
$1.69
DASH:
71.77
LUN.TO:
16.04
DASH:
0.11
LUN.TO:
0.10
DASH:
4.51
LUN.TO:
5.76
DASH:
6.53
LUN.TO:
3.40
DASH:
$14.72B
LUN.TO:
$4.04B
DASH:
$7.49B
LUN.TO:
$1.55B
DASH:
$1.69B
LUN.TO:
$1.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DASH vs. LUN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DASH
LUN.TO
DASH vs. LUN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) and Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DASH | LUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.44 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 4.91 | -5.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 15.81 | -16.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DASH vs. LUN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DASH drawdown since its inception was -82.49%, smaller than the maximum LUN.TO drawdown of -96.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DASH and LUN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DASH | LUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.49% | -96.11% | +13.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.97% | -33.87% | -14.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.97% | -49.40% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.49% | -57.23% | -25.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.55% | -16.41% | -30.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -52.54% | +9.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.70% | 10.49% | +17.21% |
Volatility
DASH vs. LUN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) is 13.74%, while Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) has a volatility of 19.73%. This indicates that DASH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DASH | LUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.74% | 19.73% | -5.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.95% | 44.66% | -12.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.43% | 53.22% | -8.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.01% | 47.16% | +6.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.03% | 46.75% | +10.28% |
Dividends
DASH vs. LUN.TO - Dividend Comparison
DASH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DASH DoorDash, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LUN.TO Lundin Mining Corporation | 0.29% | 0.68% | 3.64% | 3.32% | 5.66% | 3.95% | 1.42% | 1.55% | 2.13% | 1.44% |
Financials
DASH vs. LUN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DoorDash, Inc. and Lundin Mining Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DASH vs. LUN.TO - Profitability Comparison
DASH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DoorDash, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.04B and revenue of 4.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.
LUN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 537.50M and revenue of 1.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.
DASH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DoorDash, Inc. reported an operating income of 151.00M and revenue of 4.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
LUN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 503.80M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.5%.
DASH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DoorDash, Inc. reported a net income of 184.00M and revenue of 4.04B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
LUN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a net income of 281.40M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DASH and LUN.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DASH and LUN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer