DARP vs. PWRD
DARP (Grizzle Growth ETF) and PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Grizzle, while PWRD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DARP returned 68.50% vs 36.33% for PWRD. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
DARP vs. PWRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DARP achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly higher than PWRD's 21.92% return.
DARP
- 1D
- -4.47%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- 26.21%
- 6M
- 25.50%
- 1Y
- 68.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWRD
- 1D
- -4.36%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 21.92%
- 6M
- 19.81%
- 1Y
- 36.33%
- 3Y*
- 33.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DARP vs. PWRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF | 26.21% | 40.19% | 24.63% | 6.25% |
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 21.92% | 32.84% | 28.54% | 8.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between DARP and PWRD is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023 | 0.77 |
The correlation between DARP and PWRD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DARP vs. PWRD — Risk / Return Rank
DARP
PWRD
DARP vs. PWRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DARP | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.25 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.83 | 2.58 | +3.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.69 | 8.57 | +12.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DARP vs. PWRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DARP drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, which is greater than PWRD's maximum drawdown of -25.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DARP and PWRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DARP | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.27% | -25.87% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.82% | -14.12% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.59% | -4.36% | -1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -5.07% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 4.25% | -0.93% |
Volatility
DARP vs. PWRD - Volatility Comparison
Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) have volatilities of 10.71% and 10.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DARP | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.71% | 10.84% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.20% | 20.67% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.83% | 25.31% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.48% | 22.89% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.48% | 22.89% | +3.59% |
DARP vs. PWRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DARP and PWRD have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
DARP vs. PWRD - Dividend Comparison
DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while PWRD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF | 0.34% | 0.43% | 1.93% | 0.32% | 0.00% |
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.49% | 0.78% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DARP and PWRD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWRD has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to DARP (10.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DARP dropped -30.27% vs PWRD's -25.87%.
On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 68.50% vs 36.33% for PWRD. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, DARP has been the lower-risk option at 10.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 68.50% return vs 36.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DARP and PWRD have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
DARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for PWRD.
DARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PWRD is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grizzle and TCW.
DARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DARP and PWRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer