PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DARP vs. PWRD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DARP vs. PWRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DARP achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly higher than PWRD's 21.92% return.


DARP

1D
-4.47%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
26.21%
6M
25.50%
1Y
68.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PWRD

1D
-4.36%
1M
4.92%
YTD
21.92%
6M
19.81%
1Y
36.33%
3Y*
33.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DARP vs. PWRD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
26.21%40.19%24.63%6.25%
PWRD
TCW Transform Systems ETF
21.92%32.84%28.54%8.92%

Correlation

The correlation between DARP and PWRD is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023

0.77

The correlation between DARP and PWRD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DARP vs. PWRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

PWRD
PWRD Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PWRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWRD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PWRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWRD Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DARP vs. PWRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DARPPWRDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.25

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.83

2.58

+3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.69

8.57

+12.12

DARP vs. PWRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DARP Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the PWRD Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DARP and PWRD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DARP vs. PWRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DARP drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, which is greater than PWRD's maximum drawdown of -25.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DARP and PWRD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DARPPWRDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.27%

-25.87%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.82%

-14.12%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.59%

-4.36%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

-5.07%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

4.25%

-0.93%

Volatility

DARP vs. PWRD - Volatility Comparison

Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) have volatilities of 10.71% and 10.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DARPPWRDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.71%

10.84%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.20%

20.67%

-1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.83%

25.31%

-0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.48%

22.89%

+3.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.48%

22.89%

+3.59%

DARP vs. PWRD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DARP and PWRD have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

DARP vs. PWRD - Dividend Comparison

DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while PWRD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.34%0.43%1.93%0.32%0.00%
PWRD
TCW Transform Systems ETF
0.00%0.22%0.49%0.78%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


DARP and PWRD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWRD has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to DARP (10.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DARP dropped -30.27% vs PWRD's -25.87%.

On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 68.50% vs 36.33% for PWRD. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, DARP has been the lower-risk option at 10.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 68.50% return vs 36.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DARP and PWRD have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

DARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for PWRD.

DARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PWRD is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grizzle and TCW.

DARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DARP and PWRD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer