PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DARP vs. OUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DARP vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DARP achieves a 27.36% return, which is significantly higher than OUSA's 8.45% return.


DARP

1D
2.64%
1M
1.10%
6M
15.74%
YTD
27.36%
1Y
54.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
34.07%

OUSA

1D
1.27%
1M
3.71%
6M
5.67%
YTD
8.45%
1Y
16.10%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
10.54%
ALL TIME*
10.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$444.32K$313.93K$438.54K
$880.04K$1.30M$1.44M

DARP vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
27.36%40.19%24.63%6.25%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
8.45%10.23%17.09%6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between DARP and OUSA is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between DARP and OUSA has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DARP vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DARP
OUSA

Technology

48.3%
23.7%

Communication Services

13.5%
10.3%

Energy

9.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
13.1%

Industrials

8.2%
11.9%

Utilities

5.2%

-

Basic Materials

4.2%

-

Healthcare

1.4%
15.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.4%

Financial Services

-

18.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

DARP
48.3%
OUSA
23.7%

Communication Services

DARP
13.5%
OUSA
10.3%

Energy

DARP
9.2%
OUSA

-

Consumer Cyclical

DARP
8.3%
OUSA
13.1%

Industrials

DARP
8.2%
OUSA
11.9%

Utilities

DARP
5.2%
OUSA

-

Basic Materials

DARP
4.2%
OUSA

-

Healthcare

DARP
1.4%
OUSA
15.1%

Consumer Defensive

DARP

-

OUSA
7.4%

Financial Services

DARP

-

OUSA
18.6%

Real Estate

DARP

-

OUSA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DARP vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DARP vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DARPOUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.28

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

1.93

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.14

6.75

+6.39

DARP vs. OUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DARP Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the OUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DARP and OUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DARP vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DARP drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, smaller than the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DARP and OUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DARPOUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.27%

-33.12%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.76%

-8.36%

-7.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.73%

0.00%

-4.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-3.50%

-1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

2.39%

+1.78%

Volatility

DARP vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison

Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a higher volatility of 10.12% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.81%. This indicates that DARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DARPOUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.12%

3.81%

+6.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.55%

8.12%

+13.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.96%

10.31%

+16.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.86%

13.39%

+13.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.86%

15.20%

+11.66%

DARP vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DARP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

DARP vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison

DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than OUSA's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.34%0.43%1.93%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.33%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


DARP and OUSA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DARP has higher volatility (10.12%) compared to OUSA (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DARP dropped -30.27% vs OUSA's -33.12%.

On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 54.61% vs 16.10% for OUSA. On fees, OUSA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 54.61% return vs 16.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OUSA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.34% for DARP.

DARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OUSA is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: Grizzle and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DARP and 0.48% for OUSA.

DARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DARP and OUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer