PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DARP vs. IDEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DARP vs. IDEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DARP achieves a 26.22% return, which is significantly higher than IDEQ's 16.51% return.


DARP

1D
0.87%
1M
-2.22%
YTD
26.22%
6M
29.87%
1Y
71.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IDEQ

1D
0.28%
1M
3.66%
YTD
16.51%
6M
19.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DARP vs. IDEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
26.22%18.60%
IDEQ
Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF
16.51%12.10%

Correlation

The correlation between DARP and IDEQ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DARP vs. IDEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

IDEQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DARP vs. IDEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DARPIDEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.19

DARP vs. IDEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DARP vs. IDEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DARP drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, which is greater than IDEQ's maximum drawdown of -12.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DARP and IDEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DARPIDEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.27%

-12.95%

-17.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.58%

-1.01%

-4.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-2.11%

-2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

Volatility

DARP vs. IDEQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DARPIDEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.11%

19.28%

+4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.29%

19.28%

+7.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.29%

19.28%

+7.01%

DARP vs. IDEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DARP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEQ's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

DARP vs. IDEQ - Dividend Comparison

DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than IDEQ's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.34%0.43%1.93%0.32%
IDEQ
Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF
0.52%0.60%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DARP and IDEQ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IDEQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDEQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

IDEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.34% for DARP.

DARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IDEQ is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grizzle and Lazard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DARP and 0.40% for IDEQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DARP and IDEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer