PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DARP vs. BCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DARP vs. BCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DARP vs. BCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
4.29%40.19%24.63%6.25%
BCHP
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF
-12.70%10.20%20.55%12.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DARP achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly higher than BCHP's -12.70% return.


DARP

1D
3.09%
1M
-6.88%
YTD
4.29%
6M
13.93%
1Y
64.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCHP

1D
3.39%
1M
-5.16%
YTD
-12.70%
6M
-13.06%
1Y
1.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DARP vs. BCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DARP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BCHP's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DARP vs. BCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

BCHP
BCHP Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DARP vs. BCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DARPBCHPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

0.07

+2.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.73

0.25

+2.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.03

+0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

0.09

+3.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.42

0.31

+16.11

DARP vs. BCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DARP Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the BCHP Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DARP and BCHP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DARPBCHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

0.07

+2.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.62

+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between DARP and BCHP is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DARP vs. BCHP - Dividend Comparison

DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while BCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.42%0.43%1.93%0.32%
BCHP
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF
0.00%0.00%1.02%0.19%

Drawdowns

DARP vs. BCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DARP drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, which is greater than BCHP's maximum drawdown of -18.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DARP and BCHP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DARPBCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.27%

-18.56%

-11.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

-18.12%

+2.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.09%

-15.19%

+6.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-2.86%

-1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

5.25%

-1.40%

Volatility

DARP vs. BCHP - Volatility Comparison

Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a higher volatility of 9.51% compared to Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) at 6.75%. This indicates that DARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DARPBCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.51%

6.75%

+2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.28%

12.33%

+6.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.51%

20.27%

+9.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.42%

16.83%

+9.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.42%

16.83%

+9.59%