PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAPP vs. HODL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAPP vs. HODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAPP achieves a 31.34% return, which is significantly higher than HODL's -27.34% return.


DAPP

1D
-1.27%
1M
4.58%
YTD
31.34%
6M
10.15%
1Y
50.76%
3Y*
59.16%
5Y*
-0.41%
10Y*

HODL

1D
-2.76%
1M
-22.17%
YTD
-27.34%
6M
-31.31%
1Y
-39.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAPP vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DAPP
VanEck Digital Transformation ETF
31.34%15.03%62.58%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
-27.34%-6.42%99.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DAPP and HODL is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.72

The correlation between DAPP and HODL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAPP vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAPP
DAPP Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

HODL
HODL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAPP vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAPPHODLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.86

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

-0.80

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.07

-1.39

+3.46

DAPP vs. HODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAPP Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the HODL Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAPP and HODL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DAPPHODLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

-0.91

+1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.28

-0.35

Drawdowns

DAPP vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAPP drawdown since its inception was -91.90%, which is greater than HODL's maximum drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAPP and HODL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAPPHODLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.90%

-49.37%

-42.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.21%

-49.37%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.99%

-49.37%

+21.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.40%

-16.03%

-41.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.58%

28.52%

-3.94%

Volatility

DAPP vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) has a higher volatility of 15.08% compared to VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) at 9.05%. This indicates that DAPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAPPHODLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.08%

9.05%

+6.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.27%

33.85%

+12.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.53%

43.55%

+17.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.90%

49.88%

+23.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.62%

49.88%

+22.74%

DAPP vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAPP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HODL's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DAPP vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison

Neither DAPP nor HODL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DAPP
VanEck Digital Transformation ETF
0.00%0.00%4.04%0.00%0.00%10.13%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DAPP and HODL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAPP has higher volatility (15.08%) compared to HODL (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAPP dropped -91.90% vs HODL's -49.37%.

On 1-year performance, DAPP leads with 50.76% vs -39.52% for HODL. On fees, HODL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HODL has been the lower-risk option at 9.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DAPP has performed better with a 50.76% return vs -39.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HODL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DAPP.

DAPP and HODL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DAPP is categorized as Technology Equities, while HODL is Cryptocurrency. DAPP tracks MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index, while HODL tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DAPP and 0.25% for HODL.

DAPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAPP and HODL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer