DAK vs. FNDB
DAK (Dakota Active Equity ETF) and FNDB (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAK is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dakota Wealth, while FNDB is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index. DAK is actively managed, while FNDB is passively managed. Over the past year, DAK returned 20.52% vs 32.18% for FNDB. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DAK charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDB.
Performance
DAK vs. FNDB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAK achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly lower than FNDB's 17.51% return.
DAK
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 9.09%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.77%
FNDB
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 12.62%
- YTD
- 17.51%
- 1Y
- 32.18%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 14.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.23K | $2.63K | $4.01K | |
| $5.69M | $5.14M | $4.73M |
DAK vs. FNDB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DAK Dakota Active Equity ETF | 10.36% | 6.75% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 17.51% | 9.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAK and FNDB is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.84 |
The correlation between DAK and FNDB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAK vs. FNDB — Risk / Return Rank
DAK
FNDB
DAK vs. FNDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dakota Active Equity ETF (DAK) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DAK | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.52 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 4.84 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.16 | 19.07 | -8.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DAK vs. FNDB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAK drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum FNDB drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAK and FNDB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAK | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -38.17% | +30.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | -6.29% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.43% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.18% | -3.62% | +2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 1.60% | +0.27% |
Volatility
DAK vs. FNDB - Volatility Comparison
Dakota Active Equity ETF (DAK) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) at 2.32%. This indicates that DAK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAK | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 2.32% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.11% | 7.65% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.39% | 10.77% | +0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 15.23% | -3.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 17.42% | -6.03% |
DAK vs. FNDB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAK has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DAK vs. FNDB - Dividend Comparison
DAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than FNDB's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAK Dakota Active Equity ETF | 0.75% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 1.43% | 1.62% | 1.74% | 1.80% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 2.23% | 2.41% | 1.91% | 2.06% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DAK and FNDB have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DAK has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to FNDB (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAK dropped -7.87% vs FNDB's -38.17%.
On 1-year performance, FNDB leads with 32.18% vs 20.52% for DAK. On fees, FNDB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDB has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FNDB has performed better with a 32.18% return vs 20.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNDB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for DAK.
FNDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.75% for DAK.
DAK is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDB is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dakota Wealth and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for DAK and 0.25% for FNDB.
FNDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DAK and FNDB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer