PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAC vs. IVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DAC vs. IVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Danaos Corporation (DAC) and Inventrust Properties Corp (IVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAC achieves a 41.54% return, which is significantly higher than IVT's 25.09% return. Over the past 10 years, DAC has underperformed IVT with an annualized return of 13.38%, while IVT has yielded a comparatively higher 38.56% annualized return.


DAC

1D
0.95%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
41.54%
6M
41.94%
1Y
52.23%
3Y*
31.85%
5Y*
16.62%
10Y*
13.38%

IVT

1D
-0.03%
1M
11.75%
YTD
25.09%
6M
22.53%
1Y
30.09%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
97.41%
10Y*
38.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAC vs. IVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DAC
Danaos Corporation
41.54%22.24%12.41%47.51%-26.57%256.10%133.44%-12.57%-48.28%-45.28%
IVT
Inventrust Properties Corp
25.09%-3.19%23.02%11.01%-10.31%2,399.18%-28.43%3.60%3.33%-26.47%

Correlation

The correlation between DAC and IVT is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2014

0.04

The correlation between DAC and IVT shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DAC:

$2.39B

IVT:

$2.74B

EPS

DAC:

$28.34

IVT:

$1.40

PE Ratio

DAC:

4.63

IVT:

24.97

PS Ratio

DAC:

2.31

IVT:

8.93

PB Ratio

DAC:

0.61

IVT:

1.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

DAC:

$1.04B

IVT:

$307.06M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DAC:

$705.76M

IVT:

$152.08M

EBITDA (TTM)

DAC:

$739.01M

IVT:

$312.91M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAC vs. IVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAC
DAC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAC Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAC Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

IVT
IVT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAC vs. IVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danaos Corporation (DAC) and Inventrust Properties Corp (IVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DACIVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.30

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.52

3.32

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.35

8.22

+6.13

DAC vs. IVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the IVT Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAC and IVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DAC vs. IVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAC drawdown since its inception was -99.42%, roughly equal to the maximum IVT drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAC and IVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DACIVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.42%

-100.00%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.58%

-8.63%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.87%

-15.71%

-13.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.14%

-74.53%

+24.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.81%

-99.99%

+4.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.36%

-0.03%

-66.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.43%

-41.06%

-39.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

3.50%

+0.45%

Volatility

DAC vs. IVT - Volatility Comparison

Danaos Corporation (DAC) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Inventrust Properties Corp (IVT) at 5.02%. This indicates that DAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DACIVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

5.02%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.51%

11.16%

+5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.41%

16.39%

+5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.36%

423.57%

-389.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.00%

297,800.29%

-297,735.29%

Dividends

DAC vs. IVT - Dividend Comparison

DAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than IVT's 2.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAC
Danaos Corporation
2.70%3.66%4.06%4.12%5.70%2.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVT
Inventrust Properties Corp
2.75%3.37%3.00%3.40%3.47%0.82%1.72%3.51%0.00%1.13%4.18%0.77%

Financials

DAC vs. IVT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Danaos Corporation and Inventrust Properties Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
253.70M
82.11M
(DAC) Total Revenue
(IVT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DAC vs. IVT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Danaos Corporation and Inventrust Properties Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
59.3%
73.3%
Portfolio components
DAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a gross profit of 150.55M and revenue of 253.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.3%.

IVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inventrust Properties Corp reported a gross profit of 60.19M and revenue of 82.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.3%.

DAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported an operating income of 125.20M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.

IVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inventrust Properties Corp reported an operating income of 14.48M and revenue of 82.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

DAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a net income of 140.42M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in a net margin of 55.4%.

IVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Inventrust Properties Corp reported a net income of 5.18M and revenue of 82.11M, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DAC and IVT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAC has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to IVT (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAC dropped -99.42% vs IVT's -100.00%.

DAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAC and IVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer