DABS vs. UCO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DABS (DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF) and UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both exchange-traded funds - DABS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine, while UCO is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). DABS is actively managed, while UCO is passively managed. Over the past year, DABS returned 5.66% vs 120.48% for UCO. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. DABS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UCO.

Performance

DABS vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DABS achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 149.12% return.

DABS

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 0.88%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 5.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UCO

• 1D: 2.71%
• 1M: -4.64%
• YTD: 149.12%
• 6M: 137.09%
• 1Y: 120.48%
• 3Y*: 25.90%
• 5Y*: 22.16%
• 10Y*: -11.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DABS vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	0.88%	5.63%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	149.12%	-23.24%

Correlation

The correlation between DABS and UCO is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025	-0.33

Return for Risk

DABS vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DABS

DABS Risk / Return Rank: 78
DABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
DABS Omega Ratio Rank: 79
DABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DABS Martin Ratio Rank: 79

UCO

UCO Risk / Return Rank: 54
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 50
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DABS vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DABS	UCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.12	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	2.46	+1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.32	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.40	3.49	+0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.21	6.60	+8.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DABS vs. UCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DABS Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the UCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DABS and UCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DABS	UCO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	2.12	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.05	-0.34	+2.39

Drawdowns

DABS vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DABS drawdown since its inception was -1.47%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DABS and UCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DABS	UCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.47%	-99.95%	+98.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.29%	-34.77%	+33.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-99.23%	+98.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.31%	-85.49%	+85.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	18.33%	-17.96%

Volatility

DABS vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) is 0.71%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 20.83%. This indicates that DABS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DABS	UCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.71%	20.83%	-20.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.60%	46.44%	-44.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49%	57.11%	-54.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.56%	59.78%	-57.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.56%	71.36%	-68.80%

DABS vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DABS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than UCO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

DABS vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

DABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	4.89%	3.81%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DABS and UCO in my portfolio?

DABS and UCO have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DABS or UCO?

UCO has higher volatility (20.83%) compared to DABS (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DABS dropped -1.47% vs UCO's -99.95%.

Which ETF is better, DABS or UCO?

On 1-year performance, UCO leads with 120.48% vs 5.66% for DABS. On fees, DABS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DABS or UCO?

Over the 1-year period, UCO has performed better with a 120.48% return vs 5.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DABS or UCO?

DABS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DABS or UCO?

DABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.

What is the main difference between DABS and UCO?

DABS is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while UCO is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DABS and 0.95% for UCO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DABS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.