DABS vs. DLUX
DABS (DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF) and DLUX (DoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DABS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine, while DLUX is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. Their -0.04 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DABS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for DLUX.
Performance
DABS vs. DLUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DABS
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.08%
DLUX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $488.99K | $528.18K | $1.01M | |
| $55.16K | $52.58K | $1.70M |
DABS vs. DLUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 1.05% |
DLUX DoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETF | 1.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between DABS and DLUX is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DABS vs. DLUX — Risk / Return Rank
DABS
DLUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DABS vs. DLUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and DoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETF (DLUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DABS | DLUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.57 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DABS vs. DLUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DABS drawdown since its inception was -1.47%, which is greater than DLUX's maximum drawdown of -0.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DABS and DLUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DABS | DLUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -0.26% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.29% | -0.04% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | — | — |
Volatility
DABS vs. DLUX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DABS | DLUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34% | 0.97% | +1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.51% | 0.97% | +1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.51% | 0.97% | +1.54% |
DABS vs. DLUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DABS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DLUX's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
DABS vs. DLUX - Dividend Comparison
DABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than DLUX's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 4.87% | 3.81% |
DLUX DoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETF | 1.16% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DABS and DLUX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DLUX is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DLUX is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DABS.
DABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.87%, compared with 1.16% for DLUX.
DABS is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while DLUX is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DABS and 0.18% for DLUX.
Find the right allocation for DABS and DLUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer