DLUX vs. DBND

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

DLUX (DoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETF) and DBND (DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DLUX is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by DoubleLine, while DBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. DLUX is actively managed, while DBND is passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DLUX charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DBND.

Performance

DLUX vs. DBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETF (DLUX) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DLUX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.42%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBND

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.51%
• 6M: -0.19%
• YTD: -0.11%
• 1Y: 3.78%
• 3Y*: 4.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLUX vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DLUX DoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETF	1.22%
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between DLUX and DBND is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026	0.12

Return for Risk

DLUX vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLUX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DBND

DBND Risk / Return Rank: 34
DBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
DBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
DBND Omega Ratio Rank: 35
DBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
DBND Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLUX vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETF (DLUX) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DLUX	DBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.17	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.72	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.34	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.58	—

Drawdowns

DLUX vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLUX drawdown since its inception was -0.13%, smaller than the maximum DBND drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLUX and DBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	DLUX	DBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.13%	-9.39%	+9.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.83%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.70%	+1.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-2.25%	+2.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DLUX	DBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91%	3.26%	-2.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.91%	5.06%	-4.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.91%	5.06%	-4.15%

DLUX vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLUX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DLUX vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison

DLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than DBND's 4.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	4.79%	4.78%	5.19%	4.39%	2.74%
DLUX DoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETF	0.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DLUX and DBND in my portfolio?

DLUX and DBND have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DLUX or DBND?

On fees, DLUX is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DLUX or DBND?

DLUX is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DLUX or DBND?

DBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 0.80% for DLUX.

What is the main difference between DLUX and DBND?

DLUX is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while DBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DLUX and 0.50% for DBND.