DLUX vs. DCMT
DLUX (DoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DLUX is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by DoubleLine, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DLUX charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.
Performance
DLUX vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DLUX
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DCMT
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 19.19%
- YTD
- 26.86%
- 1Y
- 30.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $415.85K | $251.93K | $202.07K | |
| $70.66K | $51.09K | $1.69M |
DLUX vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DLUX DoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETF | 1.33% |
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF | -0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLUX and DCMT is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLUX vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank
DLUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DCMT
DLUX vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETF (DLUX) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DLUX | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DLUX vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLUX drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLUX and DCMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLUX | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -15.96% | +15.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -8.93% | +8.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -3.58% | +3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.68% | — |
Volatility
DLUX vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLUX | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90% | 18.98% | -18.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.90% | 16.02% | -15.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.90% | 16.02% | -15.12% |
DLUX vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLUX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
DLUX vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison
DLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than DCMT's 2.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF | 2.89% | 3.67% | 1.59% |
DLUX DoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETF | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DLUX and DCMT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DLUX is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DLUX is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.
DCMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.80% for DLUX.
DLUX is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while DCMT is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DLUX and 0.66% for DCMT.
Find the right allocation for DLUX and DCMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer