PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CYH.TO vs. XML.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CYH.TO vs. XML.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CYH.TO (iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and XML.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - CYH.TO tracks the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD while XML.TO tracks the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) 100% Hedged to CAD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CYH.TO returned 8.21%/yr vs 7.35%/yr for XML.TO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CYH.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for XML.TO.

Performance

CYH.TO vs. XML.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYH.TO achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly higher than XML.TO's 3.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CYH.TO has outperformed XML.TO with an annualized return of 8.21%, while XML.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.35% annualized return.

CYH.TO

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
10.22%
6M
11.20%
1Y
23.68%
3Y*
16.48%
5Y*
8.53%
10Y*
8.21%

XML.TO

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
3.89%
6M
5.30%
1Y
9.96%
3Y*
13.01%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*
7.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CYH.TO vs. XML.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CYH.TO
iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		10.22%18.77%12.29%3.84%-2.47%23.43%-8.71%14.38%-6.21%13.16%
XML.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		3.89%17.56%14.13%11.69%-6.94%13.27%-5.87%16.26%-3.28%15.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CYH.TO and XML.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2016

0.41

The correlation between CYH.TO and XML.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CYH.TO vs. XML.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CYH.TO
XML.TO

Financial Services

23.4%
19.9%

Utilities

15.9%
9.1%

Energy

14.2%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

11.9%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
5.2%

Communication Services

8.2%
9.7%

Healthcare

5.1%
12.4%

Industrials

4.9%
15.1%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.6%

Technology

3.4%
4.5%

Real Estate

1.1%
2.9%

Financial Services

CYH.TO
23.4%
XML.TO
19.9%

Utilities

CYH.TO
15.9%
XML.TO
9.1%

Energy

CYH.TO
14.2%
XML.TO
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

CYH.TO
11.9%
XML.TO
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CYH.TO
8.4%
XML.TO
5.2%

Communication Services

CYH.TO
8.2%
XML.TO
9.7%

Healthcare

CYH.TO
5.1%
XML.TO
12.4%

Industrials

CYH.TO
4.9%
XML.TO
15.1%

Basic Materials

CYH.TO
3.6%
XML.TO
1.6%

Technology

CYH.TO
3.4%
XML.TO
4.5%

Real Estate

CYH.TO
1.1%
XML.TO
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with CYH.TO:
CYH.TO vs. XDG.TOCYH.TO vs. CUD.TOCYH.TO vs. VDY.TOCYH.TO vs. XEI.TOCYH.TO vs. ZDIVXCYH.TO vs. XDIV.TOCYH.TO vs. VEQT.TO
Often compared with XML.TO:
XML.TO vs. XIN.TOXML.TO vs. XMI.TOXML.TO vs. XMU.TOXML.TO vs. HXQ.TOXML.TO vs. XSP.TOXML.TO vs. XEQT.TOXML.TO vs. XMW.TO

Return for Risk

CYH.TO vs. XML.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CYH.TO
CYH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CYH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
XML.TO
XML.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
XML.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XML.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
XML.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XML.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XML.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYH.TO vs. XML.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CYH.TOXML.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.39
1.15

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.38
1.63

+1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.23

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

2.00

+2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.05

5.42

+11.63

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CYH.TO vs. XML.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the XML.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYH.TO and XML.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CYH.TOXML.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

1.15

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.97

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.61

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.62

-0.29

Drawdowns

CYH.TO vs. XML.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYH.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.48%, which is greater than XML.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYH.TO and XML.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CYH.TOXML.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.48%

-28.62%

-32.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.34%

-4.88%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.13%

-7.46%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.67%

-12.34%

-5.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.30%

-28.62%

-13.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-4.26%

+2.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.94%

-3.41%

-6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

1.80%

-0.41%

Volatility

CYH.TO vs. XML.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XML.TO) have volatilities of 2.62% and 2.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CYH.TOXML.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

2.60%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.13%

6.48%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.96%

8.50%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.58%

9.70%

+3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

12.09%

+4.93%

CYH.TO vs. XML.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CYH.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than XML.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

CYH.TO vs. XML.TO - Dividend Comparison

CYH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than XML.TO's 2.66% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CYH.TO
iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		3.33%3.77%4.33%4.68%4.72%3.89%4.51%4.01%3.98%3.03%3.39%3.84%
XML.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.66%2.76%2.67%2.56%2.02%1.92%1.11%3.62%2.77%1.92%3.34%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

CYH.TO and XML.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XML.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XML.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for CYH.TO.

CYH.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while XML.TO tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) 100% Hedged to CAD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for CYH.TO and 0.40% for XML.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CYH.TO and XML.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer