PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXW vs. UFO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CXW vs. UFO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXW achieves a 20.67% return, which is significantly lower than UFO's 53.53% return.


CXW

1D
6.22%
1M
18.74%
YTD
20.67%
6M
23.91%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
38.82%
5Y*
20.62%
10Y*
-0.49%

UFO

1D
2.77%
1M
16.90%
YTD
53.53%
6M
68.11%
1Y
138.54%
3Y*
48.04%
5Y*
16.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXW vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CXW
CoreCivic, Inc.
20.67%-12.10%49.62%25.69%15.95%52.21%-59.85%-10.18%
UFO
Procure Space ETF
53.53%67.36%27.22%-2.34%-25.85%7.17%-2.15%5.34%

Correlation

The correlation between CXW and UFO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXW vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXW
CXW Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CXW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CXW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXW Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

UFO
UFO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
UFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
UFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXW vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CXWUFODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.48

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

6.35

-6.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.34

20.55

-20.20

CXW vs. UFO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXW Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the UFO Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXW and UFO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CXWUFODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

3.66

-3.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.54

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.47

-0.45

Drawdowns

CXW vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXW drawdown since its inception was -98.54%, which is greater than UFO's maximum drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXW and UFO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXWUFODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.54%

-50.33%

-48.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.41%

-21.95%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.62%

-25.91%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.68%

-50.33%

+10.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.43%

-12.48%

-8.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.73%

-21.81%

-34.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.06%

6.77%

+7.29%

Volatility

CXW vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) is 15.76%, while Procure Space ETF (UFO) has a volatility of 16.68%. This indicates that CXW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXWUFODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.76%

16.68%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.68%

31.33%

-2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.25%

38.15%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.14%

29.94%

+14.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.23%

30.76%

+18.47%

Dividends

CXW vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison

CXW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CXW
CoreCivic, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.44%7.59%9.65%7.47%8.34%8.15%
UFO
Procure Space ETF
0.28%0.46%1.98%1.90%3.19%1.00%1.07%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CXW and UFO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UFO has higher volatility (16.68%) compared to CXW (15.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXW dropped -98.54% vs UFO's -50.33%.

UFO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.66 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXW and UFO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer