PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXSE vs. WTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CXSE vs. WTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than WTV's 10.52% return.


CXSE

1D
-1.05%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.93%
6M
0.61%
1Y
24.36%
3Y*
10.95%
5Y*
-8.07%
10Y*
7.43%

WTV

1D
-0.96%
1M
4.55%
YTD
10.52%
6M
11.62%
1Y
23.33%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
13.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXSE vs. WTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
0.93%37.00%8.56%-18.02%-29.32%-23.67%59.39%37.96%-28.55%3.13%
WTV
WisdomTree US Value ETF
10.52%13.51%23.99%22.35%-8.06%30.59%6.15%29.69%-8.29%1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CXSE and WTV is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2017

0.40

The correlation between CXSE and WTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CXSE vs. WTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CXSE
WTV

Consumer Cyclical

26.2%
10.7%

Technology

22.6%
15.3%

Industrials

16.6%
10.5%

Communication Services

10.1%
6.9%

Healthcare

8.8%
7.3%

Financial Services

6.2%
19.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
10.7%

Basic Materials

3.4%
2.2%

Real Estate

0.9%
5.3%

Energy

0.4%
6.8%

Utilities

0.3%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CXSE
26.2%
WTV
10.7%

Technology

CXSE
22.6%
WTV
15.3%

Industrials

CXSE
16.6%
WTV
10.5%

Communication Services

CXSE
10.1%
WTV
6.9%

Healthcare

CXSE
8.8%
WTV
7.3%

Financial Services

CXSE
6.2%
WTV
19.5%

Consumer Defensive

CXSE
3.9%
WTV
10.7%

Basic Materials

CXSE
3.4%
WTV
2.2%

Real Estate

CXSE
0.9%
WTV
5.3%

Energy

CXSE
0.4%
WTV
6.8%

Utilities

CXSE
0.3%
WTV
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXSE vs. WTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXSE
CXSE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CXSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXSE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CXSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXSE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

WTV
WTV Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXSE vs. WTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CXSEWTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.35

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

3.28

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.90

10.69

-7.79

CXSE vs. WTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the WTV Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXSE and WTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CXSEWTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

1.99

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

0.77

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.67

-0.48

Drawdowns

CXSE vs. WTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than WTV's maximum drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and WTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXSEWTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.01%

-42.18%

-27.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

-7.15%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.12%

-18.49%

-13.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.47%

-19.30%

-45.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.01%

-0.96%

-45.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.83%

-5.06%

-22.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.42%

2.19%

+6.23%

Volatility

CXSE vs. WTV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) at 3.02%. This indicates that CXSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXSEWTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

3.02%

+4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.54%

7.90%

+6.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.39%

11.83%

+9.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.30%

17.09%

+15.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.70%

20.20%

+8.50%

CXSE vs. WTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than WTV's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

CXSE vs. WTV - Dividend Comparison

CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than WTV's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
1.99%1.95%1.70%1.71%1.55%0.86%0.54%0.96%1.49%1.24%1.39%2.50%
WTV
WisdomTree US Value ETF
1.65%1.59%1.54%1.62%2.08%1.55%1.63%1.44%1.94%0.41%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CXSE and WTV have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CXSE has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to WTV (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXSE dropped -70.01% vs WTV's -42.18%.

On 5-year performance, WTV leads with 13.17% vs -8.07% for CXSE. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, WTV has performed better with a 13.17% return vs -8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for CXSE.

CXSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.65% for WTV.

CXSE is categorized as China Equities, while WTV is Large Cap Value Equities. CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while WTV tracks WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CXSE and 0.12% for WTV.

WTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXSE and WTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer