PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXSE vs. DXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CXSE vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a -2.80% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 21.58% return. Over the past 10 years, CXSE has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 6.52%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.67% annualized return.


CXSE

1D
1.60%
1M
3.19%
6M
-4.37%
YTD
-2.80%
1Y
6.79%
3Y*
6.76%
5Y*
-6.30%
10Y*
6.52%
ALL TIME*
4.89%

DXJ

1D
2.00%
1M
-0.36%
6M
12.08%
YTD
21.58%
1Y
47.92%
3Y*
31.10%
5Y*
27.15%
10Y*
18.67%
ALL TIME*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.94M$1.25M$1.09M
$74.22M$63.63M$59.62M

CXSE vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
-2.80%37.00%8.56%-18.02%-29.32%-23.67%59.39%37.96%-28.55%81.50%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
21.58%32.78%29.83%42.04%5.96%17.99%3.94%18.94%-19.78%22.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CXSE and DXJ is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2012

0.37

The correlation between CXSE and DXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CXSE vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CXSE
DXJ

Technology

31.4%
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

21.7%
13.3%

Industrials

12.6%
29.5%

Communication Services

12.2%
2.3%

Healthcare

8.8%
6.8%

Financial Services

5.8%
18.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
4.7%

Basic Materials

2.9%
9.1%

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Energy

0.4%
1.7%

Utilities

0.2%
0.1%

Technology

CXSE
31.4%
DXJ
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CXSE
21.7%
DXJ
13.3%

Industrials

CXSE
12.6%
DXJ
29.5%

Communication Services

CXSE
12.2%
DXJ
2.3%

Healthcare

CXSE
8.8%
DXJ
6.8%

Financial Services

CXSE
5.8%
DXJ
18.3%

Consumer Defensive

CXSE
3.7%
DXJ
4.7%

Basic Materials

CXSE
2.9%
DXJ
9.1%

Real Estate

CXSE
0.7%
DXJ

-

Energy

CXSE
0.4%
DXJ
1.7%

Utilities

CXSE
0.2%
DXJ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXSE vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CXSE
CXSE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
CXSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXSE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CXSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXSE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CXSE vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CXSEDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.47

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

4.39

-4.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.67

16.26

-15.60

CXSE vs. DXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the DXJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXSE and DXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CXSE vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than DXJ's maximum drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and DXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXSEDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.01%

-49.63%

-20.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

-10.98%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.83%

-22.19%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.68%

-22.19%

-36.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.01%

-39.14%

-30.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.00%

-3.14%

-44.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.07%

-14.24%

-13.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.22%

2.96%

+7.26%

Volatility

CXSE vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) at 5.90%. This indicates that CXSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXSEDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.12%

5.90%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.20%

14.56%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.58%

18.18%

+4.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.02%

19.10%

+12.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.80%

19.92%

+8.88%

CXSE vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

CXSE vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison

CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than DXJ's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
1.49%1.95%1.70%1.71%1.55%0.86%0.54%0.96%1.49%1.24%1.39%2.50%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
0.96%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


CXSE and DXJ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CXSE has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to DXJ (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXSE dropped -70.01% vs DXJ's -49.63%.

On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.67% vs 6.52% for CXSE. On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.67% return vs 6.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.

CXSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.96% for DXJ.

CXSE is categorized as China Equities, while DXJ is Japan Equities. CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CXSE and 0.48% for DXJ.

DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXSE and DXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer